Cecilia De La Torre v. Americredit Financial Services, Inc. et al
Cecilia De La Torre |
Americredit Financial Services, Inc., Does 1 through 50, Inclusive and Americredit Financial Services, Inc. Erroneously Sued As General Motors Financial Company, Inc. doing business as GM Financial |
8:2019cv00653 |
April 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER & ORDER RE: PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES by Judge David O. Carter. Discovery cut-off 2/24/2020. Motions cut-off 4/20/2020 at 8:30 a.m. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/18/2020 at 8:30 a.m. before Judge David O. Carter. Jury Trial set for 6/2/2020 at 8:30 a.m. before Judge David O. Carter. (rrp) |
Filing 14 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge David O. Carter. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 10/23/2019. (rrp) |
Filing 13 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Order to be issued. Court Reporter: CourtSmart; Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Lewman; Plaintiff Attorney: Michael Boyle O'Beirne; Defendant Attorney: Michael A. Hood; Time in Court: 0:02. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rrp) |
Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Defendant Americredit Financial Services, Inc... (Takahashi, Momo) |
Filing 11 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Joint Stipulation to Continue 4/22/19 Initial Scheduling Conference #10 . Scheduling Conference continued to 6/3/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (twdb) |
Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Initial Scheduling Conference from April 22, 2019 to May 20, 2019 Re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #9 filed by Defendant Americredit Financial Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Continue April 22, 2019 Initial Scheduling Conference)(Takahashi, Momo) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 4/22/2019 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (dgo) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Autumn D. Spaeth. New Case Number 8:19-cv-653 DOC (ADSx). (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Americredit Financial Services, Inc., Does 1 through 50, Inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Cecilia De La Torre. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/31/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A 8) (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Cecilia De La Torre, upon Defendant Americredit Financial Services, Inc. served on 3/6/2019, answer due 3/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Lawyers Registered Agent by leaving with Vanessa Hernandez Person Authorized to Accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/12/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B 33) (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Americredit Financial Services, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/29/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C 36)(ghap) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Americredit Financial Services, Inc. dba GM Financial, identifying Cecilia De La Torre; Americredit Financial Services, Inc. dba GM Financial; General Motors Financial Company, Inc.; General Motors Holdings, LLC; and General Motors Company. (Takahashi, Momo) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Americredit Financial Services, Inc. dba GM Financial identifying General Motors Financial Company, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Takahashi, Momo) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Americredit Financial Services, Inc. dba GM Financial. (Takahashi, Momo) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2019-01048212-CU-OE-CJC Receipt No: 0973-23498601 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Americredit Financial Services, Inc. dba GM Financial. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael A. Hood in support of Removal of Action to Federal Court, #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Proof of Service, #4 Exhibit C - Conformed Answer, #5 Exhibit D - Printout from California Secretary of State, #6 Exhibit Defendant's Factsheet, #7 Exhibit F - Mr. Avrahamy's California State Bar Printout, #8 Exhibit Mr. O'Beirne's California State Bar Printout, #9 Declaration of Tara Arndt in support of Removal of Action to Federal Court) (Attorney Momo Emily Takahashi added to party Americredit Financial Services, Inc. dba GM Financial(pty:dft))(Takahashi, Momo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.