Merlin Inman et al v. Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc. et al
| Merlin Inman and Julie Schnelker |
| Equifax, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and TransUnion, LLC |
| 8:2019cv00842 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J Guilford |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. § 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc., identifying Diversified Adjustment Service. (Iglesias, Lawrence) |
| Filing 22 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc..(Attorney Lawrence K Iglesias added to party Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.(pty:dft))(Iglesias, Lawrence) |
| Filing 21 Defendant Trans Union LLC's CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant TransUnion, LLC, identifying Trans Union LLC as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Trans Union Intermediate Holdings, Inc., which is wholly-owned by TransUnion. (Bradley, Donald) |
| Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to TransUnion, LLC answer now due 7/12/2019, filed by Defendant TransUnion, LLC.(Attorney Donald E Bradley added to party TransUnion, LLC (pty:dft))(Bradley, Donald) |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc., identifying Experian plc, Central Source LLC, Online Data Exchange LLC, New Management Services LLC, VantageScore Solutions LLC, Opt-Out Services LLC. (Pham, Bao) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Attorney Bao A Pham added to party Experian Information Solutions, Inc.(pty:dft))(Pham, Bao) |
| Filing 17 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge Andrew J. Guilford: The Court sets the following dates: Discovery Cut-off is April 7, 2020. A Final Pretrial Conference is set for June 22, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. A Jury Trial is set for July 7, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. Court sets the length of the trial at 3 days. Counsel stipulate to and the Court orders ADR Procedure No. 2. Additionally, the Court sets an Order to Show Cause re: sanctions, including attorney's fees, dismissal or monetary sanctions, for failure to appear this date, failure to prosecute and failure to obey Court orders, for July 8, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. Counsel for Defendant may appear at the Order to Show Cause hearing but his appearance is not required. Court Reporter: Miriam Baird. (es) |
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER SPECIFYING PROCEDURES by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (mku)
|
| Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Equifax, Inc.. (es) |
| Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Merlin Inman, Julie Schnelker. (Goldstein, Amir) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER FOR EARLY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: Scheduling Conference set for 6/17/2019 at 9:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (See order) (es)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request, #4 . The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Transunion, LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Andrew J. Guilford for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Autumn D. Spaeth. New Case Number 8:19-cv-842 AG (ADSx). (ghap) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Merlin Inman, Julie Schnelker. (Goldstein, Amir) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Merlin Inman, Julie Schnelker. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request #2, #2 Summons Request #3, #3 Summons request #4)(Goldstein, Amir) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Merlin Inman, Julie Schnelker, (Goldstein, Amir) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Merlin Inman, Julie Schnelker. (Goldstein, Amir) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23663175 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Merlin Inman, Julie Schnelker. (Attorney Amir J Goldstein added to party Merlin Inman(pty:pla), Attorney Amir J Goldstein added to party Julie Schnelker(pty:pla))(Goldstein, Amir) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
