Obria Group Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
| Obria Group Inc. and Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California |
| U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Roger Severino and Alex M. Azar |
| 8:2019cv00905 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Rassbach, Eric) |
| Filing 32 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California, upon Defendant Roger Severino served on 5/21/2019, answer due 7/22/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Genoveva Ortega, Legal Assistant. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to (Signature unreadable). Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Rassbach, Eric) |
| Filing 31 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California, upon Defendant U.S. Department of Health and Human Services served on 5/21/2019, answer due 7/22/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Genoveva Ortega, Legal Assistant. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to (Signature unreadable). Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Shantell Jiggetts. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Rassbach, Eric) |
| Filing 30 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California, upon Defendant Alex M. Azar served on 5/21/2019, answer due 7/22/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Genoveva Ortega, Legal Assistant. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to (Signature unreadable). Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Shantell Jiggetts. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Rassbach, Eric) |
Filing 29
ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: granting #26 Non-Resident Attorney Christopher C Pagliarella APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Obria Group, Inc., a California nonprofit corporation; and Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California, a California non-profit corporation, designating Rosa M.C. Cumare as local counsel. (bm)
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: granting #25 Non-Resident Attorney Mark L Rienzi APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Obria Group, Inc., a California nonprofit corporation; and Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California, a California non-profit corporation, designating Rosa M.C. Cumare as local counsel. (bm)
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: granting #24 Non-Resident Attorney Lori H Windham APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Obria Group, Inc., a California nonprofit corporation; and Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California, a California non-profit corporation, designating Rosa M.C. Cumare as local counsel. (bm)
|
| Filing 26 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Christopher C. Pagliarella to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23778765) filed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration Proof of Service) (Cumare, Rosa Maria) |
| Filing 25 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Mark L. Rienzi to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23778705) filed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration Proof of Service) (Cumare, Rosa Maria) |
| Filing 24 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lori H. Windham to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23778353) filed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration Proof of Service) (Cumare, Rosa Maria) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Rosa Maria Christina Cumare on behalf of Plaintiffs Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California (Attorney Rosa Maria Christina Cumare added to party Obria Group Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Rosa Maria Christina Cumare added to party Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California(pty:pla))(Cumare, Rosa Maria) |
| Filing 22 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg) |
| Filing 21 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant William Barr, Attorney General of the United States. (car) |
| Filing 20 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Nicola T. Hana, United States Attorney's Office. (car) |
| Filing 19 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Roger Severino. (car) |
| Filing 18 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (car) |
| Filing 17 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Alex M. Azar. (car) |
| Filing 16 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California. (Rassbach, Eric) |
| Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California. (Rassbach, Eric) |
| Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California. (Rassbach, Eric) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California. (Rassbach, Eric) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California. (Rassbach, Eric) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: A temporary restraining order (TRO) flag was indicated, but no TRO document was filed. The TRO flag will be removed. (car) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Chris Pagliarella. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Lori H. Windham. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Mark L. Rienzi. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California, (Rassbach, Eric) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California. (Rassbach, Eric) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California. (Rassbach, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23734154 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Obria Group Inc., Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California. (Attorney Eric Rassbach added to party Obria Group Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Eric Rassbach added to party Obria Medical Clinics of Southern California(pty:pla))(Rassbach, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
