Susan Lee v. Bien Hen Seafood and Lau LLC, et al
| SUSAN LEE |
| QUARTZ HILL, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, BIEN HEN SEAFOOD & LAU LLC, Bien Hen Seafood and Lau LLC and Bien Hen Seafood and Lau LLC doing business as Bien Hen Restaurant |
| 8:2019cv00912 |
| May 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Karen E Scott |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Bien Hen Seafood and Lau LLC, Quartz Hill, LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff SUSAN LEE, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff SUSAN LEE. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff SUSAN LEE. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23742265 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff SUSAN LEE. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party SUSAN LEE (pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
