JD Tamimi v. SGS North America Inc
Plaintiff: JD Tamimi
Defendant: SGS North America Inc and Does 1-20, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2019cv00965
Filed: May 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andrew J Guilford
Referring Judge: Karen L Stevenson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2019 Filing 18 REPLY Support of Motion NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #14 filed by Plaintiff JD Tamimi. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice)(Weerasuriya, Suren)
July 8, 2019 Filing 17 Opposition Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #14 filed by Defendant SGS North America Inc. (Attachments: #1 Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice In Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Remanding Case to Superior Court and Awarding Attorney's Fees and Costs to Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit A to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice In Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Remanding Case to Superior Court, #3 Exhibit B to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice In Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Remanding Case to Superior Court, #4 Exhibit C to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice In Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Remanding Case to Superior Court)(Lavi, Rachael)
July 1, 2019 Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff JD Tamimito Order to Show Cause, #13 (Weerasuriya, Suren)
June 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER REGARDING EARLY MEETING OF PARTIES AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Scheduling Conference set for 8/26/2019 at 9:00 a.m. (mku)
June 26, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court filed by Plaintiff JD Tamimi. Motion set for hearing on 7/29/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Weerasuriya, Suren)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than July 1, 2019, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (es)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RE RULE 23-3 DEADLINE #11 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford : (1) Defendants deadline to respond to the Complaint is continued to 14 days after the Court issues an order on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand; (2) Plaintiffs deadline to file a Motion for Class Certification under Rule 23-3 is continued to the later of February 14, 2020, or six months from the date of the hearing on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand; and (3) this order supersedes and replaces the prior stipulation between the parties pursuant to Local Rule 8-3 providing defendants with a 30-day extension to Defendants time to respond. (lc)
May 23, 2019 Filing 11 STIPULATION to Continue Local Rule 23-3 Deadline from August 15, 2019 to February 14, 2020 filed by Plaintiff JD Tamimi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Weerasuriya, Suren)
May 23, 2019 Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to SGS North America Inc answer now due 6/21/2019, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff JD Tamimi.(Weerasuriya, Suren)
May 21, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to clerical error. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been reassigned to Judge Andrew J. Guilford for all further proceedings. Any matters previously referred are transferred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. New Case Number 8:19-cv-00965 AG (KSx). (jp)
May 20, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jp)
May 20, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (jp)
May 20, 2019 Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant SGS North America Inc, re Notice of Related Case(s) #3 , Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 served on May 20, 2019. (Lavi, Rachael)
May 17, 2019 CONFORMED COPY OF ORIGINAL ELECTRONICALLY FILED COMPLAINT filed by plaintiff JD Tamimi against Defendants SGS North America Inc., Does 1-20. Jury Demand. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/16/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHMENT NO. 4 OF EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ). (jp)
May 17, 2019 Filing 5 Defendant's CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant SGS North America Inc, identifying Plaintiff JD Tamimi; Defendant SGS North America Inc.; SGS US Holdings Inc. (parent company of SGS North America Inc.); and SGS S.A. (100% owner of SGS US Holdings Inc.).. (Lavi, Rachael)
May 17, 2019 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant SGS North America Inc identifying SGS North America Inc. is a privately held corporation, and a wholly owned subsidiary of SGS US Holdings Inc. SGS US Holdings Inc. is in turn 100% owned by SGS S.A., which is publicly traded on the SIX Swiss Exchange as Corporate Parent. (Lavi, Rachael)
May 17, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant SGS North America Inc. Related Case(s): None (Lavi, Rachael)
May 17, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant SGS North America Inc. (Lavi, Rachael)
May 17, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2019-01064123 Receipt No: 0973-23760914 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant SGS North America Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Deri Nyhuis In Support of Defendant's Notice of Removal of Civil Action to Federal Court Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sects. 1332, 1441 and 1446, #2 Declaration of Tracy Zysk In Support of Defendant's Notice of Removal of Civil Action to Federal Court Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sects. 1332, 1441 and 1446, #3 Declaration of Rachael Lavi In Support of Defendant's Notice of Removal of Civil Action to Federal Court Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sects. 1332, 1441 and 1446, #4 Exhibit A to Declaration of Rachael Lavi In Support of Defendant's Notice of Removal of Civil Action to Federal Court Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sects. 1332, 1441 and 1446) (Attorney Rachael Sarah Lavi added to party SGS North America Inc(pty:dft))(Lavi, Rachael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JD Tamimi v. SGS North America Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SGS North America Inc
Represented By: Bradley E Schwan
Represented By: Rachael Sarah Lavi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JD Tamimi
Represented By: Jessica L Campbell
Represented By: Samuel A Wong
Represented By: Suren N Weerasuriya
Represented By: Kashif Haque
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?