Xerox Corporation v. American Business Card LLC
| Xerox Corporation |
| AMERICAN BUSINESS CARD LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and American Business Card LLC |
| XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation |
| 8:2019cv00983 |
| May 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned case is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv) |
Filing 19
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED THAT the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. (iv)
|
|
Filing 18
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff shall, no later than 7/8/2019, file a first amended complaint. The REQUEST #16 for Clerk to Enter Default is denied without prejudice. (vdr)
|
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of Robert V. McKendrick re REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against AMERICAN BUSINESS CARD LLC American Business Card LLC #16 filed by Plaintiff Xerox Corporation. (McKendrick, Robert) |
| Filing 16 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against AMERICAN BUSINESS CARD LLC American Business Card LLC filed by XEROX CORPORATION Xerox Corporation. (McKendrick, Robert) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: JURISDICTION AND WRIT OF POSSESSION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Possession #11 is denied without prejudice. Any amended or renewed motion for writ of possession must satisfy applicable statutory requirements and remedy the above-stated defects. No later than 6/24/2019, plaintiff shall filed a First Amended Complaint thatremedies the above-stated defects. (vdr)
|
| Filing 14 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Xerox Corporation, upon Defendant American Business Card LLC served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (McKendrick, Robert) |
| Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion for Writ of Possession #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. A Word or Wordperfect version of the proposed order should also be emailed to the chambers generic email address. See Local Rule 5-4.4.1- Electronic Lodging of Proposed Orders. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Writ of Writ of Possession filed by Plaintiff, XEROX CORPORATION Xerox Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 7/25/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration Declaration in Support Thereof) (McKendrick, Robert) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff, XEROX CORPORATION Xerox Corporation, identifying NONE. (McKendrick, Robert) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 . Document number 5 due to clerical error. Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program was issued in error without caption of plaintiff and defendant by the docket clerk. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant American Business Card LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff, Xerox Corporation XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation. (McKendrick, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation. (McKendrick, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23788853 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff, Xerox Corporation XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation. (Attorney Robert V McKendrick added to party XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation(pty:bkmov))(McKendrick, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
