Atef A. Elzeftawy v. Michael Baker International, Inc.
Atef A. Elzeftawy |
Michael Baker International, Inc. and DOES 1-50, inclusive |
8:2019cv01001 |
May 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andrew J Guilford |
Karen L Stevenson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7, filed by Plaintiff Atef A. Elzeftawy.. (Pedersen, Neil) |
Filing 11 Notice of Electronic Filing re Text Only Scheduling Notice 10 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #9 , Complaint - (Discovery), Answer to Complaint (Discovery) e-mailed to John C. McCarty bounced due to Unknown address. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: The Court hereby CONTINUES the Scheduling Conference set for July 22, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. to Monday, July 29, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING EARLY MEETING OF PARTIES AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Scheduling Conference set for 7/22/2019 at 09:00 AM. (rrp) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Michael Baker International, Inc. in Orange County Superior Court on 5/23/2019, attached as Exhibit 2.(jtil) Modified on 5/29/2019 (jtil). |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Atef A. Elzeftawy in Orange County Superior Court on 4/8/2019, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
Filing 6 DECLARATION OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Michael Baker International, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on May 24, 2019. (Lee, Jamie) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Michael Baker International, Inc.. Related Case(s): Superior Court Orange County 30-2019-01062205-CU-OE-CJC (Lee, Jamie) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Michael Baker International, Inc. identifying Michael Baker International Holdco Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Lee, Jamie) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Michael Baker International, Inc., identifying Michael Baker International, Inc. and Michael Baker International Holdco Corporation. (Lee, Jamie) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Michael Baker International, Inc.. (Lee, Jamie) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court - Orange County, case number 30-2019-01062205-CU-OE-CJC Receipt No: 0973-23802500 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Michael Baker International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Declaration of Ryan Lynch, #3 Declaration of Jamie Y. Lee, #4 Exhibit 1 to Jamie Y. Lee Declaration, #5 Exhibit 2 to Jamie Y. Lee Declaration) (Attorney Jamie Y Lee added to party Michael Baker International, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lee, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.