Adlife Marketing and Communications Co., Inc. v. Jetro Cash and Carry Enterprises LLC et al
Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc. and Adlife Marketing and Communications Co. Inc. |
Restaurant Depo, LLC, Jetro Holdings, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, Jetro Cash & Carry Enterprises, LLC, Jetro Cash and Carry Enterprises LLC, Restaurant Depot, LLC and Does 1 through 10 inclusive |
8:2019cv01053 |
May 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Josephine L Staton |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint By 30 Days (L.R. 7-1) #20 by Judge Josephine L. Staton that each Defendant shall respond to the initial complaint by 8/26/2019. (jp) |
Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 08/26/2019 re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #18 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Jetro Cash and Carry Enterprises LLC, Jetro Holdings, LLC, Restaurant Depot, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lobbin, Stephen) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Jetro Cash and Carry Enterprises LLC, Jetro Holdings, LLC, Restaurant Depot, LLC, identifying JRD Holdings, LLC and JRD Unico, Inc.. (Lobbin, Stephen) |
Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Restaurant Depot, LLC, Jetro Holdings, LLC, Jetro Cash and Carry Enterprises LLC.(Attorney Stephen M Lobbin added to party Jetro Cash and Carry Enterprises LLC (pty:dft), Attorney Stephen M Lobbin added to party Jetro Holdings, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Stephen M Lobbin added to party Restaurant Depot, LLC(pty:dft))(Lobbin, Stephen) |
Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adlife Marketing and Communications Co. Inc., upon Defendant Restaurant Depot, LLC served on 6/4/2019, answer due 6/25/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jolita Quindara, managing agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Higbee, Mathew) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adlife Marketing and Communications Co. Inc., upon Defendant Jetro Cash and Carry Enterprises LLC served on 6/4/2019, answer due 6/25/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jolita Quindara, managing agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Higbee, Mathew) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adlife Marketing and Communications Co. Inc., upon Defendant Jetro Holdings, LLC served on 6/4/2019, answer due 6/25/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jolita Quindara, managing agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Higbee, Mathew) |
Filing 14 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg) |
Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Restaurant Depot, LLC. (et) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Jetro Holdings, LLC. (et) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Jetro Cash and Carry Enterprises LLC. (et) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et) |
Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Mathew K Higbee counsel for Plaintiff Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.. Adding Mathew K. Higbee as counsel of record for Plaintiff Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Adlife Marketing & Communications Co. Inc.. (Attorney Mathew K Higbee added to party Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.(pty:pla))(Higbee, Mathew) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.. (Carreon, Ryan) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.. (Carreon, Ryan) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.. (Carreon, Ryan) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.. (Carreon, Ryan) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc. (Carreon, Ryan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.. (Carreon, Ryan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23833004 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E-1, #6 Exhibit E-2, #7 Exhibit E-3, #8 Exhibit E-4, #9 Exhibit E-5, #10 Exhibit E-6, #11 Exhibit E-7, #12 Exhibit E-8, #13 Exhibit E-9) (Attorney Ryan E Carreon added to party Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.(pty:pla))(Carreon, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.