James Ray Taylor v. George Jaime
| James Ray Taylor |
| Mr. George Jaime |
| 8:2019cv01085 |
| June 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Sheri Pym |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #15 , Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Docket text and document conflict re: name of party. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 16 REQUEST to Extend Time to File Answer to 9/30/2019 filed by Respondent George Jaime. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Danzig, Douglas) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Adrianne S Denault counsel for Respondent George Jaime. Adrianne Denault is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent George Jaime. (Denault, Adrianne) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Douglas P Danzig counsel for Respondent George Jaime. Adding Douglas P. Danzig as counsel of record for George Jaime for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent George Jaime. (Attorney Douglas P Danzig added to party George Jaime(pty:res))(Danzig, Douglas) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Adrianne S Denault on behalf of Respondent George Jaime (Attorney Adrianne S Denault added to party George Jaime(pty:res))(Denault, Adrianne) |
Filing 12
ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Petition Part 2, #3 Part 3, #4 Part 4, #5 CV-11B) (kca)
|
| Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Denying #5 MOTION to Void or Dismiss Prior Enhancement (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca) |
| Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Denying #3 MOTION for an Expedited Hearing (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca) |
| Filing 9 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Accordingly,the $5.00 filing fee is ordered WAIVED. (kca) |
| Filing 8 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Denying without prejudice 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error, the incorrect judge's initials were indicated on the documents. The correct judge's initials should be MWF(SP). (lwag) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car) |
| Filing 5 MOTION AND REQUEST TO MAKE VOID OR DISMISS THE 667A PRIOR ENHANCEMENT filed by Petitioner James Ray Taylor. (car) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Petitioner James Ray Taylor. (car) |
| Filing 3 MOTION AND REQUEST FOR AN EXPEDITED HEARING filed by Petitioner James Ray Taylor. (car) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner filed by Petitioner James Ray Taylor. (car) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner James Ray Taylor. (car) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/5/2019: #1 Part 2 of Petition) (car). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/5/2019: #2 Part 3 of Petition, #3 Envelopes) (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: James Ray Taylor v. George Jaime | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James Ray Taylor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Mr. George Jaime | |
| Represented By: | Douglas P Danzig |
| Represented By: | Adrianne S Denault |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
