Solutionz Videoconferencing, Inc. v. Jim Davidson et al
| Solutionz Videoconferencing, Inc. |
| Jim Davidson, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and DOES 1-50 inclusive |
| 8:2019cv01132 |
| June 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J Guilford |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #8 filed by Defendant Jim Davidson. (Cole, William) |
| Filing 12 Opposition in Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #8 filed by Plaintiff Solutionz Videoconferencing, Inc.. (Lazo, Marc) |
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, GRANTING #10 Non-Resident Attorney Francisco E. Connell APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Solutionz Videoconferencing, Inc., designating Marc Lazo as local counsel. (es)
|
| Filing 10 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Francisco E. Connell to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Solutionz Videoconferencing, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24070041) filed by Plaintiff Solutionz Videoconferencing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Letter Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order Order on Application) (Lazo, Marc) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REGARDING EARLY MEETING OF PARTIES AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Scheduling Conference set for 8/19/2019 at 9:00 a.m. (mku)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Jim Davidson. Motion set for hearing on 8/5/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Jim Davidson's Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint) (Cole, William) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Notice to Adverse Parties of Removal to Federal Court with the Superior Court for the County of Orange filed by defendant Jim Davidson. (Cole, William) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Solutionz Videoconferencing, Inc. filed in Orange County Superior Court on 5/7/2019, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Jim Davidson, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on June 6, 2019. (Cole, William) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Jim Davidson, identifying James R. Davidson, Jr.. (Cole, William) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Jim Davidson. (Cole, William) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2019-01068349-CU-BC-CJC Receipt No: 0973-23878448 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Jim Davidson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal (Complaint), #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit Cto Notice of Removal, #4 Declaration of William P. Cole, #5 Declaration of Brian Wallach, #6 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Brial Wallach, #7 Declaration of James R. Davidson, Jr.) (Attorney William P Cole added to party Jim Davidson(pty:dft))(Cole, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
