Carmen John Perri v. Vahe Poladian et al
Carmen John Perri |
Does 1-10 inclusive, Vahe Poladian and Jacqueline Poladian |
8:2019cv01200 |
June 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Michael R Wilner |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Defendant Jacqueline Poladian. (jp) |
Filing 15 REQUEST for Entry of Default against Defendant Jacqueline Poladian filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Re Request for Entry of Default) (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, upon Defendant Vahe Poladian served on 7/13/2019, answer due 8/5/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, upon Defendant Jacqueline Poladian served on 7/13/2019, answer due 8/5/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Jacqueline Poladian. (ghap) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Vahe Poladian. (ghap) |
Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (rfi) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Michael R. Wilner. New Case Number 8:19-cv-1200 DSF (MRWx). (ghap) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23924196 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party Carmen John Perri(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.