Carmen John Perri v. Mengyi Jia et al
| Carmen John Perri |
| MSM Carson, L.L.C., Mengyi Jia and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 8:2019cv01262 |
| June 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/11/2019. (ake)
|
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, upon Defendant MSM Carson, L.L.C. served on 7/25/2019, answer due 8/15/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, upon Defendant Mengyi Jia served on 7/13/2019, answer due 8/5/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mengyi Jia, identifying Mengyi Jia, MSM Carson, L.L.C., Carmen John Perri. (Gross, Kenneth) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND, CROSSCLAIM against MSM Carson, L.L.C. filed by Defendant Mengyi Jia.(Attorney Kenneth I Gross added to party Mengyi Jia(pty:dft))(Gross, Kenneth) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Courts Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. (shb)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant MSM Carson, L.L.C. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Mengyi Jia. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (et) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23967716 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party Carmen John Perri(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
