Apogee Law Group P.C. v. Cathy Trading, LLC
| Apogee Law Group P.C. |
| CATHY TRADING, LLC d/b/a WANTBA, Cathy Trading, LLC and Cathy Trading, LLC a Maryland limited liability company doing business as Wantba |
| 8:2019cv01294 |
| June 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. § 0009 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Ordering Respondent to Find Counsel by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. The Court will give Defendant thirty (30) days to obtain counsel. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
| Filing 15 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (McLaughlin, Craig) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Apogee Law Group P.C., upon Defendant Cathy Trading, LLC served on 7/16/2019, answer due 8/6/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ms. Yun Chen designated to accept service on behalf of Respondent Cathy Trading, LLC in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. Summons served with Petition to Confirm Arb Award including Exs. A, B. (McLaughlin, Craig) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: granting #11 Non-Resident Attorney Robert P. Hart APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff, Apogee Law Group P.C., designating Craig McLaughlin as local counsel. (sbou)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Robert P. Hart to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Petitioner Apogee Law Group P.C. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24056914) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed. Certificates of Good Standing have been required since 9/08. See LR 83-2.1.3.3. See Instructions for Applicants (1) (G-64). (lt) |
| Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Robert P. Hart to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Petitioner Apogee Law Group P.C. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24056914) filed by Petitioner Apogee Law Group P.C.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (McLaughlin, Craig) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Cathy Trading, LLC. (sbou) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #8 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #6 filed by Petitioner Apogee Law Group P.C.. (McLaughlin, Craig) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Apogee Law Group P.C., identifying Apogee Law Group P.C.. (McLaughlin, Craig) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Robert Hart. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: Please put for the Central District of California. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Petitioner Apogee Law Group P.C.. (McLaughlin, Craig) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Apogee Law Group P.C.. (McLaughlin, Craig) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to Confirm Arbitration Award Receipt No: 0973-24000455 - Fee: $400, filed by Petitioner Apogee Law Group P.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Petition, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Petition) (Attorney Craig McLaughlin added to party Apogee Law Group P.C.(pty:pet))(McLaughlin, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
