Jorge Swank v. Andrew M. Saul
Jorge Swank |
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul |
8:2019cv01500 |
August 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Michael R Wilner |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 60 DAY Summons Issued as to defendant Andrew M. Saul at United States Attorney's Office. re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (vm) |
Filing 17 60 DAY Summons Issued as to defendant Andrew M. Saul at Attorney General of the United States. re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (vm) |
Filing 16 60 DAY Summons Issued as to defendant Andrew M. Saul at Office of the Regional Counsel, Region 9 . re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (vm) |
Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jorge Swank. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Summons, #2 Supplement Summons)(Goetz, David) |
Filing 14 ORDER on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a specific case Pro Hac Vice by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Court, having determined whether the required fee has been paid, and having reviewed the Application of Non-Resident Attorney to appear in a specific case Pro Hac Vice filed by David B. Goetz for permission to appear and participate in this case on behalf of Jorge Swank (Plaintiff) and designating a Local counsel Moselle C. Leland hereby ORDERS that the Application be GRANTED. finding as moot #9 Non-Resident Attorney APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice ; finding as moot #11 Non-Resident Attorney APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice ; granting #13 Non-Resident Attorney APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (vm) |
Filing 13 Amended APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David B. Goetz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jorge Swank (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 8/23/2019, Receipt No. 0973-24317651) filed by Plaintiff Jorge Swank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order On Application of Non-Resident Attorney To Appear In A Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Leland, Judith) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David B. Goetz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jorge Swank (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 8/23/2019, Receipt No. 0973-24317651) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): No signature by local counsel. (lom) |
Filing 11 First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David B. Goetz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jorge Swank (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 8/23/2019, Receipt No. 0973-24317651) filed by Plaintiff Jorge Swank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order On Application of Non-Resident Attorney To Appear In A Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Attorney Judith S Leland added to party Jorge Swank(pty:pla)) (Leland, Judith) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David B. Goetz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jorge Swank (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24317651) #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state and/or federal courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. (lt) |
Filing 9 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David B. Goetz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Jorge Swank (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24317651) filed by Plaintiff Jorge Swank. (Kaplan, Jesse) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued as to defendant Andrew M. Saul. re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (vm) |
Filing 7 Plaintiff's NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jorge Swank, (Kaplan, Jesse) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jorge Swank. (Kaplan, Jesse) |
Filing 5 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT Updated 7/8/2019) by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (See Minute Order for details) (vm) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was/were found: No Summons (AO-440) has been filed. A Summons must be filed with the Complaint. Counsel must file a Summons immediately. In response to this notice, the Court order the Summons to be filed. (vm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24198321 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jorge Swank. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet) (Attorney Jesse S Kaplan added to party Jorge Swank(pty:pla))(Kaplan, Jesse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.