Diana Villasis v. The Neiman Marcus Group LLC et al
| DIANA VILLASIS |
| Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Kelly Bartlett, The Neiman Marcus Group LLC and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 8:2019cv01502 |
| August 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Joint Stipulation to Arbitration and Stay Case Pending Arbitration #19 . Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration currently set for hearing on 9/30/19, is off calendar without prejudice. Made JS-6. Case Terminated. (twdb)
|
| Filing 19 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Arbitration filed by Defendants Kelly Bartlett, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hartley, Claire) |
| Filing 18 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter: The Scheduling Conference previously scheduled for 9/9/2019 @ 8:30 AM has been rescheduled. Scheduling Conference set for 10/7/2019 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 17 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #16 filed by Defendants Kelly Bartlett, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Request For Judicial Notice ISO Motion To Compel Arbitration)(Hartley, Claire) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendants Kelly Bartlett, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group LLC. Motion set for hearing on 9/30/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities ISO Motion To Compel Arbitration, #2 Declaration of Claire Hartley ISO Motion To Compel Arbitration, #3 Declaration of John Marazio ISO Motion To Compel Arbitration, #4 Proposed Order Granting Motion To Compel Arbitration) (Hartley, Claire) |
| Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial N/A, filed by Defendants Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group LLC.. (Vigil, Heather) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE Plaintiff's Demand for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Diana Villasis. (DeLuca, Philip) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 9/9/2019 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
|
Filing 12
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil) |
| NON CONFORMED ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendants Kelly Bartlett, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. and The Neiman Marcus Group LLC. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Diana Villasis in Orange County Superior Court on 4/10/2019, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Kelly Bartlett, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on August 1, 2019. (Hartley, Claire) |
| Filing 8 DECLARATION of John Marazio re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants Kelly Bartlett, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group LLC. (Hartley, Claire) |
| Filing 7 DECLARATION of Michelle Morgan re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants Kelly Bartlett, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group LLC. (Hartley, Claire) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Claire E. Hartley re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants Kelly Bartlett, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group LLC. (Hartley, Claire) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants Kelly Bartlett, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group LLC. Related Case(s): None (Hartley, Claire) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants All Defendants, identifying Plaintiff Diana Villasis; Defendant Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.; Defendant The Neiman Marcus Group LLC; Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLC; Mariposa Intermediate Holdings LLC; Defendant Kelly Bartlett. (Hartley, Claire) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Kelly Bartlett, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group LLC identifying Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLC as Corporate Parent. (Hartley, Claire) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Kelly Bartlett, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group LLC. (Hartley, Claire) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2019-01062806-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: 0973-24198447 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Kelly Bartlett, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Defendants' Answer To Complaint) (Attorney Claire Elyse Hartley added to party Kelly Bartlett(pty:dft), Attorney Claire Elyse Hartley added to party Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Claire Elyse Hartley added to party The Neiman Marcus Group LLC(pty:dft))(Hartley, Claire) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
