Ancynthina Ho v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Ancynthina Ho |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
8:2019cv01545 |
August 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Patrick J Walsh |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh for all further proceedings. Please use the case number SACV19-1545 PJW on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attorney Annabelle J Yang added to party Commissioner of Social Security Administration(pty:dft))(Yang, Annabelle) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ancynthina Ho, upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration served on 8/29/2019, answer due 12/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C Veloz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Emily Sase. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to illegible. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (sbou) |
Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Ancynthina Ho. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh: ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Plaintiff will promptly serve the summons and complaint on the government in accordance with Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff will file an appropriate proof of service within 30 days of the date of this Order. Government counsel must file a notice of appearance within 30 days of service of the action. SEE ORDER. (im) |
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60)by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh #5 (im) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (car) |
Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Ancynthina Ho. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Ancynthina Ho. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ancynthina Ho, (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ancynthina Ho. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Ancynthina Ho. (Attorney Troy Dana Monge added to party Ancynthina Ho(pty:pla))(Monge, Troy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.