Steven D Braunstein v. Samantha Diaz Durazo et al
Plaintiff: Steven D'Braunstein, Steven D Braunstein and Todd D Braunstein
Defendant: California Highway Patrol Officer Samantha Diaz Durazo, California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2019cv01553
Filed: August 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Regarding Motion to Re-Tax Costs #64 by Judge James V. Selna: For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to re-tax costs. The Court DENIES the award of costs to Defendants. Granting #64 MOTION for Taxation of Costs. See Order for details. (es)
July 15, 2022 Filing 67 [IN CHAMBERS] Text Only Entry: The tentative ruling on Plaintiff's Motion to Re-Tax Costs #64 having been posted, the hearing set for 7/18/2022 at 1:30 pm is VACATED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 3, 2022 Filing 66 REPLY TO OPPOSITON TO MOTION TO RETAX COSTS filed by Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein. (Carrillo, Luis)
June 27, 2022 Filing 65 Opposition in opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Re-Tax Costs against California Highway Patrol #64 filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo. (Ovsepyan, Iveta)
June 9, 2022 Filing 64 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Re-Tax Costs against California Highway Patrol filed by Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein. Motion set for hearing on 7/18/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge James V. Selna. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Carrillo, Luis)
June 2, 2022 Filing 63 BILL OF COSTS. Costs Taxed in amount of $ $6,407.75 in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff re: APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein #60 . (ts)
April 4, 2022 Filing 62 REPLY to Plaintiffs Objections to Application to Tax Cost filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo. (Ovsepyan, Iveta)
March 30, 2022 Filing 61 OBJECTION REGARDING DEFENDANTS BILLS OF COSTS re: APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein #60 filed by Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein. (Carrillo, Luis)
March 16, 2022 Filing 60 APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein filed by Defendant California Highway Patrol. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support of Application to Tax Costs) (Ovsepyan, Iveta)
March 7, 2022 Filing 59 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 22-55237 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #57 as to plaintiff Todd D Braunstein. (es)
March 3, 2022 Filing 58 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #56 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
March 3, 2022 Filing 57 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein. Appeal of Judgment,, #55 , Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Motion for Hearing,,, #54 . (Appeal Fee - $505 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32885935.) (Esner, Stuart)
March 3, 2022 Filing 56 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Stuart Bruce Esner on behalf of Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein (Attorney Stuart Bruce Esner added to party Todd D Braunstein(pty:pla))(Esner, Stuart)
March 2, 2022 Filing 55 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, IT IS ADJUDGED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED under Rule 54(b), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, dismissing the action with prejudice following the entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendants, the State of California, acting by and through the California Highway Patrol, and Samantha Diaz Durazo. However, all state claims are dismissed without prejudice because the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over those claims. 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment #54 . (es)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MINUTES [IN CHAMBERS] Order Regarding Motion for Summary Judgment #45 by Judge James V. Selna: Defendants State of California ("California"), California Highway Patrol ("CHP"), and Samantha Diaz Durazo ("Durazo") (collectively, "Defendants") filed a motion for summary judgment. Mot., Dkt. No. #45 . Plaintiff Todd D'Braunstein ("T. D'Braunstein") opposed the motion. Opp'n, Dkt. No. #48 . Defendants replied. Reply, Dkt. No. #50 . For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS in part the motion for summary judgment and DISMISSES sua sponte the state law claims without prejudice. Granting in part #45 Motion for Summary Judgment. [See document for further details.] MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (es)
February 16, 2022 Filing 53 RESPONSE re REQUEST for Hearing Re Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment #51 filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo. (Ovsepyan, Iveta)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MINUTE ORDER [IN CHAMBERS] Order Regarding Hearing Request by Judge James V. Selna: On February 15, Plaintiff Todd D'Braunstein ("T. D'Braunstein") filed a request for hearing. See Dkt. No. #51 . The Court requests that Defendants State of California ("California"), California Highway Patrol ("CHP"), and Samantha Diaz Durazo ("Durazo") (collectively, "Defendants") file a brief, not to exceed five pages, responding to the arguments in the hearing request by February 22, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. (es)
February 15, 2022 Filing 51 REQUEST for Hearing Re Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein. (Carrillo, Luis)
January 31, 2022 Filing 50 REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment , or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof #45 filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Deputy Attorney General Iveta Ovsepyan in Support of Reply Memorandum)(Ovsepyan, Iveta)
January 24, 2022 Filing 49 Opposition to separate statement re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment , or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof #45 filed by Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein. (Carrillo, Luis)
January 24, 2022 Filing 48 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment , or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof #45 filed by Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of J. Miguel Flores in Support Opposition to Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18)(Carrillo, Luis)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER ALLOWING LIMITED DISCOVERY AFTER THE JANUARY 21, 2022, NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF DATE by Judge James V. Selna, The Court, Hereby ORDERS that the Scheduling Order be amended to allow the parties to conduct limited discovery after the January 21, 2022, non-expert discovery cutoff date for the limited purpose of conducting a physical examination of Plaintiff after the immediate risk of exposure to COVID-19 has subsided. re Stipulation for Order, #46 (es)
January 18, 2022 Filing 46 Joint STIPULATION for Order TO PERMIT LIMITED DISCOVERY AFTER THE JANUARY 21, 2022, NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order ALLOWING LIMITED DISCOVERY AFTER THE JANUARY 21, 2022, NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF DATE)(Ovsepyan, Iveta)
January 13, 2022 Filing 45 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment , or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo. Motion set for hearing on 2/14/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge James V. Selna. (Attachments: #1 Separate Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, #2 Declaration of Deputy Attorney General Iveta Ovsepyan, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proposed Judgment) (Ovsepyan, Iveta)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER DENIED MODIFYING THE SCHEDULING ORDER #42 by Judge James V. Selna. (lom)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING CORRECT PARTIES AND CLAIMS by Judge James V. Selna, The Court, hereby ORDERS: 1. Plaintiff's first and second claims alleged in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint under federal law are alleged against Defendant Samantha Diaz Durazo only; 2. Plaintiff's third, fourth and fifth claims alleged in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint under California state law are alleged against both Defendant Samantha Diaz Durazo and the State of California, acting by and through the California Highway Patrol; and 3. Plaintiff's first and second claims under federal law are hereby dismissed as to the State of California, acting by and through the California Highway Patrol, only. re Stipulation for Order #41 . (es)
January 4, 2022 Filing 42 Joint STIPULATION to Modify Scheduling Order,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, #40 filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Modifying the Scheduling Order)(Ovsepyan, Iveta)
January 4, 2022 Filing 41 Joint STIPULATION for Order Regarding Correct Parties and Claims filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Stipulation Regarding Correct Parties and Claims)(Ovsepyan, Iveta)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER MODIFYING THE SCHEDULING ORDER #39 by Judge James V. Selna. NOTE: Changes Made by the Court. The Court, hereby ORDERS that the Scheduling Order be Amended as Follows: Non-Expert Discovery January 21, 2022. Law and Motion Cut-Off February 21, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. Final Pretrial Conference April 4, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. Jury Trial April 26, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. [See document for details and deadlines.] (es)
June 16, 2021 Filing 39 JOINT STIPULATION to #10 Modify the Scheduling Order filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] Order Modifying the Scheduling Order)(Ovsepyan, Iveta)
June 11, 2021 Filing 38 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of California Attorney General Office Iveta Ovsepyan on behalf of Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo. California Attorney General Paul F Arentz terminated. (Ovsepyan, Iveta)
June 11, 2021 Filing 37 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Iveta Ovsepyan counsel for Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo. Paul F. Arentz is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants State of California, acting by and through the California Highway Patrol, and Samantha Diaz Durazo. (Ovsepyan, Iveta)
June 11, 2021 Filing 36 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Iveta Ovsepyan on behalf of Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo (Attorney Iveta Ovsepyan added to party California Highway Patrol(pty:dft), Attorney Iveta Ovsepyan added to party Samantha Diaz Durazo(pty:dft))(Ovsepyan, Iveta)
May 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER AUGMENTING THE SCHEDULING ORDER #34 by Judge James V. Selna, The Court hereby ORDERS the Scheduling Order be amended as follows: Non-Expert Discovery 7/6/2021. Expert Disclosures 7/20/2021. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures 8/3/2021. Expert Discovery Cut-Off 9/3/2021. (es)
May 22, 2021 Filing 34 Joint STIPULATION to Amend Order,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, #33 filed by Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carrillo, Luis)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER MODIFYING THE SCHEDULING ORDER #32 by Judge James V. Selna. The Court, hereby orders that the scheduling order be amended as follows: Non-Expert Discovery June 14, 2021. Expert Discovery Cut-Off August 27, 2021. Law and Motion Cut-Off August 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. Final Pretrial Conference September 13, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. Jury Trial [noted date change] September 28, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. (See document for further details.) (es)
March 18, 2021 Filing 32 Joint STIPULATION to MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER filed by Joint Todd D Braunstein. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carrillo, Luis)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER MODIFYING THE TRIAL DATE ONLY #30 by Judge James V. Selna, the Court, hereby ORDERS that the scheduling order be Amended as Follows: Jury Trial continued to 7/27/2021 at 8:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. (es)
October 19, 2020 Filing 30 Joint STIPULATION for Order to Modify the Trial Date filed by Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carrillo, Luis)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER MODIFYING THE SCHEDULING ORDER #28 by Judge James V. Selna. Non-Expert Discovery 4/2/2021. Expert Disclosures 4/16/2021. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures 5/26/2021. Motion Filing Deadline 4/26/2021. Law and Motion Cut-Off 6/1/2021 at 1:30 p.m. at 8:30 a.m. Expert Discovery Cut-Off 6/18/2021. File Motions in Limine 5/31/2021. File Pretrial Documents 6/22/2021. Final Pretrial Conference 6/28/2021 at 11:00 a.m. at 11:00 a.m. Jury Trial 7/13/2021 at 8:30 a.m. at 8:30 a.m. (es)
September 16, 2020 Filing 28 Joint STIPULATION for Order MODIFYING THE SCHEDULING ORDER filed by Plaintiff Todd D Braunstein. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carrillo, Luis)
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER #24 by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS.] (es)
April 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER MODIFYING THE SCHEDULING ORDER #25 by Judge James V. Selna. The Court, hereby orders the Scheduling Order Amended as follows: Final Pretrial Conference Jan. 19, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. Jury Trial Feb. 2, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (es)
April 17, 2020 Filing 25 Joint STIPULATION for Order TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER filed by PLAINTIFF Todd D Braunstein. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carrillo, Luis)
March 12, 2020 Filing 24 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo.(Arentz, Paul)
March 6, 2020 Filing 23 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #22 filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo.(Arentz, Paul)
February 7, 2020 Filing 22 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Todd D Braunstein amending Complaint - (Discovery) JURY DEMAND, filed by PLAINTIFF Todd D Braunstein(Carrillo, Luis)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #20 by Judge James V. Selna. It is ordered, as follows: 1. Plaintiff may file Plaintiffs proposed First Amended Complaint as their First Amended Complaint. 2. Defendants shall have 30 days from the date Plaintiffs file their First Amended Complaint to file a responsive pleading. 3. Nothing in this order prohibits any party from filing any appropriate responsive pleading in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (es)
February 5, 2020 Filing 20 STIPULATION to Amend filed by Joint Todd D Braunstein. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carrillo, Luis)
February 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY #18 by Judge James V. Selna. HAVING CONSIDERED PLAINTIFFS Application to substitute TODD D'BRAUNSTEIN for STEVEN D'BRAUNSTEIN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT TODD D'BRAUNSTEIN shall be substituted as the party for STEVEN D'BRAUNSTEIN. (es)
January 10, 2020 Filing 18 STIPULATION to SUBSTITUTE PARTY filed by Plaintiff Steven D Braunstein. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit)(Carrillo, Luis)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL SETTING DATES; PREPARATION FOR TRIAL; AND GOVERNING ATTORNEY AND PARTY CONDUCT AT TRIAL before Judge James V. Selna. (See Document for Details and Deadlines) (lb)
October 7, 2019 Filing 17 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge James V. Selna: The Courtsets the case management dates with the agreement of counsel as follows: Jury Trial October 20, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. Final PreTrial Conference October 5, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. Discovery Cut-off July 15, 2020. Expert Discovery Cut-off September 25, 2020. Law and Motion Cut-off August 31, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. The Court orders that any settlement discussions shall be completed not later than September 15, 2020. (See document for further details.) Court Reporter: Sharon Seffens. (es)
September 30, 2019 Filing 15 JOINT RULE 26(F) REPORT (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Carrillo, Luis)
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: GRANTING #10 Steven D'Braunstein Plaintiff's Request to Substitute Attorney Luis A. Carrillo and Michael S. Carrillo, Retained Counsel as attorney of record instead of Roger W. Lopez and Richard Katz. (es)
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 10/7/2019 at 11:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 9/30/2019. (lb)
September 5, 2019 Filing 12 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carrillo, Luis)
September 4, 2019 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo.(Arentz, Paul)
August 30, 2019 Filing 10 SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY (Carrillo, Luis) Modified on 9/3/2019 (es).
August 20, 2019 Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
August 19, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
August 19, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap)
August 14, 2019 FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. 0973-24258427 for $400 filing fee. (Arentz, Paul)
August 13, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Deficiency in Attorney Case Opening - optional html form #4 . Document number 4 due to clerical error. The docket clerk failed to attach the entire image of the new action. (ghap)
August 13, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (ghap)
August 13, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (ghap)
August 12, 2019 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants California Highway Patrol, Samantha Diaz Durazo, Does 1 through 100, inclusive., filed by plaintiff Steven D Braunstein. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/3/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
August 12, 2019 Filing 3 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, California Highway Patrol Officer Samantha Diaz Durazo, identifying Samantha Diaz Durazo. (Arentz, Paul)
August 12, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, California Highway Patrol Officer Samantha Diaz Durazo. (Arentz, Paul)
August 12, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2019-01074290 CU PO CJC Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol Officer Samantha Diaz Durazo, California Highway Patrol. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons) (Attorney Paul F Arentz added to party California Highway Patrol(pty:dft), Attorney Paul F Arentz added to party California Highway Patrol Officer Samantha Diaz Durazo(pty:dft))(Arentz, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steven D Braunstein v. Samantha Diaz Durazo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven D'Braunstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven D Braunstein
Represented By: Richard M Katz
Represented By: Roger W Lopez
Represented By: Luis Allen Carrillo
Represented By: Michael S Carrillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Todd D Braunstein
Represented By: Richard M Katz
Represented By: Roger W Lopez
Represented By: Luis Allen Carrillo
Represented By: Michael S Carrillo
Represented By: Stuart Bruce Esner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Highway Patrol Officer Samantha Diaz Durazo
Represented By: Paul F Arentz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Highway Patrol
Represented By: Paul F Arentz
Represented By: Iveta Ovsepyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samantha Diaz Durazo
Represented By: Paul F Arentz
Represented By: Iveta Ovsepyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?