Roy Davis Gash v. FDK La Veta, LP et al
Roy Davis Gash |
FDK LA VETA, LP and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
8:2019cv01671 |
August 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant FDK La Veta, LP. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs Roy Davis Gash. (Wakefield, David) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Roy Davis Gash, identifying FDK LA VETA, LP. (Wakefield, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash. (Wakefield, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24363608 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Roy Davis Gash. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A To Complaint) (Attorney David C Wakefield added to party Roy Davis Gash(pty:pla))(Wakefield, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.