Roy Davis Gash v. Villa Mesa Ltd et al
Plaintiff: Roy Davis Gash
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive and VILLA MESA LTD
Case Number: 8:2019cv01701
Filed: September 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: granting #10 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to VILLA MESA, LTD. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 12/15/2019. (es)
October 18, 2019 Filing 10 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Villa Mesa Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Lauren Stockunas added to party Villa Mesa Ltd(pty:dft)) (Stockunas, Lauren)
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 11/25/2019 at 10:00 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 11/18/2019. (lb)
September 10, 2019 Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
September 9, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Villa Mesa Ltd. (jtil)
September 9, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
September 9, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil)
September 5, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs Roy Davis Gash. (Wakefield, David)
September 5, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, identifying VILLA MESA LTD. (Wakefield, David)
September 5, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash. (Wakefield, David)
September 5, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24387850 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Roy Davis Gash. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A To Complaint) (Attorney David C Wakefield added to party Roy Davis Gash(pty:pla))(Wakefield, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roy Davis Gash v. Villa Mesa Ltd et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VILLA MESA LTD
Represented By: Lauren Stockunas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy Davis Gash
Represented By: David C Wakefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?