Bryan Williams v. Tony Nguyen et al
| Bryan Williams |
| Quoc Auto Repair, Vicky Yen Tran, Tony Tuyen Nguyen and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 8:2019cv01705 |
| September 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| James V Selna |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams, re Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #11 served on 09/25/2019. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant Vicky Yen Tran served on 9/24/2019, answer due 10/15/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Vicky Yen Tran by Binh Ngueyn, Co-occupant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant Quoc Auto Repair served on 9/20/2019, answer due 10/11/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Quoc Auto Repair by John Doe, Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant Tony Tuyen Nguyen served on 9/20/2019, answer due 10/11/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Tony Tuyen Nguyen in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 11
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 11/18/2019 at 10:00 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 11/11/2019. (lb)
|
| Filing 10 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 9 CORRECTED 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Tony Tuyen Nguyen, Quoc Auto Repair, Vicky Yen Tran. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Notice of clerical error due to incorrect information on the 21 DAY Summons #7 . Docket item 7 should be disregarded. A corrected Summons will be issued. (car) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Tony Tuyen Nguyen, Quoc Auto Repair, Vicky Yen Tran. (car) Modified on 9/9/2019 (car). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24391736 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Bryan Williams(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
