Cathy Vo v. BMW of North America LLC
Plaintiff: Cathy Vo
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive and BMW of North America, LLC
Case Number: 8:2019cv01758
Filed: September 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL CASE: The Court, having been notified by counsel for the parties that this action has been settled re Notice of Settlement #18 , hereby orders this action DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court retains jurisdiction for sixty (60) days to vacate this order and reopen the action upon showing of good cause that the settlement has not been consummated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (dgo)
October 31, 2019 Filing 18 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Dixon, Robert)
October 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Text Only Order re Settlement Conference #16 by Judge David O. Carter: Notice of Settlement due by 10/31/2019. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 25, 2019 Filing 16 MINUTES OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE held before Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. Settlement discussions are held off the record. Settlement is reached and placed on the record. Parties shall file a Notice of Settlement within five (5) days. Court Recorder: CS 10/25/2019. (hr)
October 24, 2019 Filing 15 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter: The Scheduling Conference previously scheduled for 10/25/2019 @ 7:30 AM has been CANCELLED. **If the case does not settle on 10/25/2019 before Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, the Scheduling Conference will be rescheduled** THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENTS by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: Confidential Settlement Conference Statements shall now be due on or before Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. All other provisions of the Court's October 18, 2019 Order Re Settlement Conference #13 shall remain. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: The Settlement Conference is placed on calendar for October 25, 2019, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 6B, 6th Floor, 411 W. Fourth Street, Santa Ana, California, 92701. No later than five (5) days prior to the Settlement Conference, each party shall submit a Confidential Settlement Conference Statement directly to the Chambers of Judge Spaeth via email to ADS_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. The Statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court and they will not be made part of the casefile. **See Order for details** (kh)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 1 by Judge David O. Carter. Case ordered to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth for Settlement Conference. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 10/25/2019. (dgo)
October 18, 2019 Filing 11 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge David O. Carter: Scheduling Conference not held. Counsel and parties with settlement authority are ORDERED to participate in a Mandatory Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth on 10/25/2019. Scheduling Conference reset for 10/25/2019 @ 07:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. Court Reporter: CourtSmart; Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Lewman; Plaintiff Attorney: Charles Lee; Defendant Attorney: Robert Kenneth Dixon; Time in Court: :10. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (dgo)
October 3, 2019 Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC.. (Turner, Vickie)
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 10/18/2019 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
September 16, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
September 16, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh)
September 16, 2019 Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant BMW of North America LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Jury Demand #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 served on 9/16/19. (Dixon, Robert)
September 16, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant BMW of North America LLC, identifying BMW (US) Holding Corp. (Dixon, Robert)
September 16, 2019 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant BMW of North America LLC. (Dixon, Robert)
September 16, 2019 Filing 2 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant BMW of North America LLC.. (Dixon, Robert)
September 16, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County, case number 30-2019-01089428-CU-BC-CJC Receipt No: 0973-24443872 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant BMW of North America LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit Decl. Ex. A Complaint, #3 Exhibit Decl. Ex. B Summons and Complaint, #4 Exhibit Decl. Ex. C BMW NA Answer, #5 Exhibit Decl. Ex. D - Leasing Agreement, #6 Exhibit Decl. Ex. E - All Pleadings) (Attorney Robert Kenneth Dixon added to party BMW of North America LLC(pty:dft))(Dixon, Robert)
September 16, 2019 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/16/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL, DOCUMENT 1-4)(lh)
September 16, 2019 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants BMW of North America, LLC, Does. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Cathy Vo. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/09/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL, DOCUMENT 1-2 #1 ) (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cathy Vo v. BMW of North America LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC
Represented By: Robert Kenneth Dixon
Represented By: Parada Kovadi Ornelas
Represented By: Vickie E Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cathy Vo
Represented By: Charles Lee
Represented By: Christopher Michael Lovasz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?