Sung Choi v. Walgreen Co. et al
| SUNG CHOI |
| DOES 1 through 10, WALGREEN CO., SHIVOM, LLC and Walgreen Co. doing business as Walgreen No. 12573 |
| 8:2019cv01762 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Shivom, LLC and Walgreen Co. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff SUNG CHOI, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff SUNG CHOI. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff SUNG CHOI. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24445491 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff SUNG CHOI. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party SUNG CHOI(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
