Jaimie Davis v. WFP Securities Corp et al
| JAIMIE DAVIS |
| WFP SECURITIES CORP., CURTIS J. SATHRE, III, JOHN E. SCHOOLER and WFP Secuities Corp. |
| 8:2019cv01763 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| James V Selna |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE In Support of Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's Petition Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) filed by Petitioner Jaimie Davis. (es) |
| Filing 12 **AMENDED** TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, County of Orange. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, County of Orange. (es) |
| Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, Stanley Mosk. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, Stanley Mosk. (es) |
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER [IN CHAMBERS] Order Remanding Case by Judge James V. Selna: The Court has made a preliminary review of the jurisdictional allegations in the: Notice of Removal ("Notice") filed by Curtis J. Sathre III ("Sathre") on September 16, 2019. Removal is barred. The case is remanded on the Court's own motion to the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Orange. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) remanding case to Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (es)
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Respondent Curtis J. Sathre, III. Amendment to Request for Judicial Notice #8 Amended [Proposed] Order (Reif, Brandon) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petitioner's Petition #7 filed by Respondent Curtis J. Sathre, III. (Reif, Brandon) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petitioner's Petition filed by Attorney for Respondent Curtis J. Sathre, III. Motion set for hearing on 10/28/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge James V. Selna. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Petitioner's Petition to Compel Arbitration in Superior Court for the County of Orange, #2 Proposed Order) (Reif, Brandon) |
| Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) |
| (PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, REQUEST FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO VACATE ABSTRACTS OF JUDGMENTS AND LIENS: MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF) COMPLAINT against Respondents Curtis J. Sathre, III, John E. Schooler, WFP Secuities Corp., filed by petitioner Jaimie Davis. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/6/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Attorney for Respondent CURTIS J. SATHRE, III, (Reif, Brandon) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Respondent CURTIS J. SATHRE, III. (Reif, Brandon) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California for the County of Orange, case number 30-2019-01088210-CU-PT-CJC Receipt No: 0973-24445550 - Fee: $400, filed by ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT CURTIS J. SATHRE, III. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Appendix of State Court Pleadings) (Attorney Brandon Scott Reif added to party CURTIS J. SATHRE, III(pty:res))(Reif, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
