Miguel Ibarra v. Navient Solutions, LLC
Miguel Ibarra |
Navient Solutions, LLC |
8:2019cv01764 |
September 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Douglas F McCormick |
Josephine L Staton |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. ยง 0009 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONVERTING BRIEFING AND SETTING HEARING ON PETITION FOR CONFIRMATION OF ARBITRATION AWARD (Doc. #1 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court CONVERTS Navient's "Counter-Petition" into its brief in opposition to Ibarra's petition. Therefore, the Court CONVERTS Ibarra's opposition to the "Counter-Petition" into his reply brief. As such, the Court treats the briefing as complete on Ibarras Petition For Confirmation Of Arbitration Award and sets it for hearing on 12/6/2019 at 10:30 AM. (jp) |
Filing 8 Opposition In opposition re: Counter PETITION to Vacate Arbitration Award and Opposition to Miguel Ibarra's Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award #7 filed by Petitioner Miguel Ibarra. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Branch, Jeremy) |
Filing 7 [DOCUMENT CONVERTED INTO ITS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION PER ORDER DATED 10/10/2019, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #9 ] - Counter PETITION to Vacate Arbitration Award and Opposition to Miguel Ibarra's Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award filed by Respondent Navient Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration and Exhibits A to L, #2 Proposed Order) (Attorney Dennis N Lueck, Jr added to party Navient Solutions, LLC (pty:res)) (Lueck, Dennis). Modified on 10/10/2019 (jp). |
Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Respondent Navient Solutions, LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (ghap) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Miguel Ibarra. (Branch, Jeremy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Miguel Ibarra. (Branch, Jeremy) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR CONFIRMATION OF ARBITRATION AWARD Receipt No: 0973-24445913 - Fee: $400, filed by Petitioner Miguel Ibarra. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Attorney Jeremy Eugene Branch added to party Miguel Ibarra(pty:pet))(Branch, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Miguel Ibarra v. Navient Solutions, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Navient Solutions, LLC | |
Represented By: | Dennis N Lueck, Jr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Miguel Ibarra | |
Represented By: | Jeremy Eugene Branch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.