Philips North America LLC et al v. KPI Healthcare, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Koninklijke Philips N.V. and Philips North America LLC
Defendant: KPI Healthcare, Inc., KPI Healthcare Ecommerce, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2019cv01765
Filed: September 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2019 Filing 26 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES and, COUNTERCLAIM against Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC filed by Defendants KPI Healthcare Ecommerce, Inc., KPI Healthcare, Inc..(Cislo, Daniel)
October 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 *NOTE: COMPLETE CASE NUMBER* ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3), #23 by Judge James V. Selna. The Court hereby grants the stipulation and extends time for all defendants to respond to the complaint to November 11, 2019. (es)
October 3, 2019 Filing 24 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants KPI Healthcare Ecommerce, Inc., KPI Healthcare, Inc., identifying KPI Healthcare, Inc. and KPI Healthcare Ecommerce, Inc.. (Veregge, Peter)
October 3, 2019 Filing 23 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to KPI Healthcare Ecommerce, Inc. answer now due 11/11/2019; KPI Healthcare, Inc. answer now due 11/11/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants KPI Healthcare Ecommerce, Inc.; KPI Healthcare, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint by Not More Than 30 Days)(Attorney Peter S Veregge added to party KPI Healthcare Ecommerce, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Peter S Veregge added to party KPI Healthcare, Inc.(pty:dft))(Veregge, Peter)
September 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 12/2/2019 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 11/25/2019. (lb)
September 25, 2019 Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Philips North America LLC, Koninklijke Philips N.V., upon Defendant KPI Healthcare Ecommerce, Inc. served on 9/20/2019, answer due 10/11/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Steven S. Minn, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Wirtschafter, Carla)
September 25, 2019 Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Philips North America LLC, Koninklijke Philips N.V., upon Defendant KPI Healthcare, Inc. served on 9/20/2019, answer due 10/11/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Steven S. Minn, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Wirtschafter, Carla)
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, GRANTING #9 Non-Resident Attorney Richard A. Graham APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., designating Carla M. Wirtschafter as local counsel. (es)
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, GRANTING #8 Non-Resident Attorney Kirsten R. Rydstrom APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., designating Carla M. Wirtschafter as local counsel. (es)
September 19, 2019 Filing 17 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
September 18, 2019 Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant KPI Healthcare, Inc. (car)
September 18, 2019 Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant KPI Healthcare Ecommerce, Inc. (car)
September 18, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
September 18, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car)
September 18, 2019 Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC. (Wirtschafter, Carla)
September 18, 2019 Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC. (Wirtschafter, Carla)
September 18, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 , Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car)
September 16, 2019 Filing 9 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Richard A. Graham to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24447336) filed by Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC. (Attachments: #1 Letter Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Wirtschafter, Carla)
September 16, 2019 Filing 8 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Kirsten R. Rydstrom to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24447287) filed by Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC. (Attachments: #1 Letter Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Wirtschafter, Carla)
September 16, 2019 Filing 7 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC. (Wirtschafter, Carla)
September 16, 2019 Filing 6 Koninklijke Philips N.V. CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC, identifying None. (Wirtschafter, Carla)
September 16, 2019 Filing 5 Philips North America LLC CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC, identifying Koninklijke Philips N.V.. (Wirtschafter, Carla)
September 16, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC. (Wirtschafter, Carla)
September 16, 2019 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC. (Wirtschafter, Carla)
September 16, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC. (Wirtschafter, Carla)
September 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24446082 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Philips North America LLC, Koninklijke Philips N.V.. (Attorney Carla M Wirtschafter added to party Koninklijke Philips N.V.(pty:pla), Attorney Carla M Wirtschafter added to party Philips North America LLC(pty:pla))(Wirtschafter, Carla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Philips North America LLC et al v. KPI Healthcare, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KPI Healthcare, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Miles Cislo
Represented By: Peter S Veregge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KPI Healthcare Ecommerce, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Miles Cislo
Represented By: Peter S Veregge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Represented By: Carla M Wirtschafter
Represented By: Richard A Graham
Represented By: Kirsten R Rydstrom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Philips North America LLC
Represented By: Carla M Wirtschafter
Represented By: Richard A Graham
Represented By: Kirsten R Rydstrom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?