Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Mission Camino Investors L.P. et al
Rafael Arroyo, Jr. |
Does 1-10, Remarc Investors, Inc., E&E Food, Inc., Mission Camino Investors L.P. and E and E Food, Inc. |
8:2019cv01785 |
September 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
James V Selna |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr... (Price, Dennis) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., upon Defendant Remarc Investors, Inc. served on 10/26/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Janice Cramer - wife of Agent, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., upon Defendant Mission Camino Investors L.P. served on 10/26/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Janice Cramer - wife of Agent, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendants E and E Food, Inc., Mission Camino Investors L.P., Remarc Investors, Inc., identifying None. (Attorney Dale J Park added to party E and E Food, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Dale J Park added to party Remarc Investors, Inc.(pty:dft))(Park, Dale) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Remarc Investors, Inc. and E & E Food, Inc.) filed by Defendants Mission Camino Investors L.P..(Attorney Dale J Park added to party Mission Camino Investors L.P.(pty:dft))(Park, Dale) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., upon Defendant E and E Food, Inc. served on 10/7/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: KWANG Y YUN in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 9 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 11/25/2019 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 10/18/2019. (lb) |
Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants E and E Food, Inc., Mission Camino Investors L.P., Remarc Investors, Inc. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24455930 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Rafael Arroyo, Jr.(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.