Mohamed Sayem v. County of Orange et al
| Mohamed Sayem |
| City of Stanton, a public entity, County of Orange, a public entity, Michael Devitt, an individual, Eric Ota, an individual, County of Orange, Michael Devitt, City of Stanton, Does 1-25 inclusive and Eric Ota |
| 8:2019cv01790 |
| September 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
MINUTES (In Chambers) ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER STAYING ACTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set for hearing 11/15/2019, is VACATED. The Court GRANTS the parties' request and STAYS all proceedings until further order of the Court. The parties are directed to file joint status reports every 90 days regarding the status of the criminal action. The first such report is due within 90 days of the entry of this Order. Additionally, the parties are to file a joint status report within 10 days of the resolution of the criminal action. (jp)
|
| Filing 17 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendants City of Stanton, County of Orange.. (Tollison, Jeanne) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Arnoldo Casillas counsel for Plaintiff Mohamed Sayem. Adding Denisse O. Gastelum as counsel of record for Mohamed Sayem for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Mohamed Sayem. (Casillas, Arnoldo) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES #14 by Judge Josephine L. Staton that Plaintiff, MOHAMED SAYEM, is granted leave to amend to file an Amended Complaint for Damages, within 20 days of the entry of this order. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that Defendants' responsive pleading shall be due thirty (30) days after the Second Amended Complaint for Damages is filed. The Motion to Dismiss the original Complaint (doc. #9 ), set for hearing on 11/15/2019, is deemed withdrawn, and the hearing is VACATED. (jp)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION to Stipulation and Order re First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Mohamed Sayem. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)(Casillas, Arnoldo) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton GRANTING Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney Arnoldo Casillas for Plaintiff Mohamed Sayem in place and stead of Daniel Azizi #12 . (jp)
|
| Filing 12 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Arnoldo Casillas in place of attorney Daniel Azizi filed by Plaintiff Mohamed Sayem. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Arnoldo Casillas added to party Mohamed Sayem(pty:pla)) (Casillas, Arnoldo) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 11/15/2019 at 10:30 a.m. See document for details. (rrp)
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants City of Stanton, County of Orange, (Kraus, Roberta) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants City of Stanton, County of Orange. Motion set for hearing on 11/15/2019 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Kraus, Roberta) |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants City of Stanton, County of Orange. (Attachments: #1 Complaint filed in State Court action on 8/13/19, #2 Civil Case Cover Sheet filed in State Court action on 8/13/19, #3 Summons filed in State Court action on 8/13/19, #4 Proof of Personal Service filed in State Court - City of Stanton - on 8/29/19, #5 Proof of Personal Service filed in State Court - County of Orange - on 9/6/19)(Kraus, Roberta) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE STATON FOLLOWING FILING OF DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants City of Stanton, County of Orange. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kraus, Roberta) |
| Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Stanton, County of Orange, Michael Devitt, Does 1-25, Eric Ota. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Mohamed Sayem. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/13/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants City of Stanton, a public entity, County of Orange, a public entity, (Kraus, Roberta) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants City of Stanton, a public entity, County of Orange, a public entity. (Kraus, Roberta) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, Central Justice, case number 30-2019-01089945 Receipt No: 0973-24459805 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants City of Stanton, a public entity, County of Orange, a public entity. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint) (Attorney Roberta A Kraus added to party City of Stanton, a public entity(pty:dft), Attorney Roberta A Kraus added to party County of Orange, a public entity(pty:dft))(Kraus, Roberta) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
