Todd Meyer v. Fifth Third Bank et al
Todd Meyer |
Fifth Third Bank and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
8:2019cv01803 |
September 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Douglas F McCormick |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #31 , CCA # 19-56506. The judgment of this Court, entered January 20, 2021, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. [sEE USCA Memorandum #35 , AFFIRMED.](mat) |
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #31 filed by Todd Meyer. CCA # 19-56506. The decision of the District Court is AFFIRMED. [See all details.](mat) |
Filing 34 ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #31 filed by Todd Meyer. CCA # 19-56506. This case shall be submitted on the briefs and record, without oral argument, on January 15, 2021, in Pasadena, California. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (car) |
Filing 33 NOTICE Notice of No Intention to Order Transcripts filed by Plaintiff Todd Meyer. (Finlayson, Jesse) |
Filing 32 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 19-56506 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #31 as to plaintiff Todd Meyer. (twdb) |
Filing 31 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by plaintiff Todd Meyer. Appeal of Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Terminated Case, #30 . (Appeal Fee - $505 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24996202.) (Toffer, Jared) |
Filing 30 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: GRANTING DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss #21 . Both claims in Plaintiffs Complaint are herebyDISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Made JS-6. Case Terminated. (twdb) |
Filing 29 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge David O. Carter: Denying #9 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb) |
Filing 28 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #21 . The Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for 12/4/2019 is removed from the calendar and the motion is taken under submission. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 27 REPLY Reply NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #21 filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Hong, Cecilia) |
Filing 26 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #21 . The Motion Hearing previously scheduled for 12/2/2019 @ 8:30 AM has been rescheduled. Motion Hearing set for 12/4/2019 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #21 filed by Plaintiff Todd Meyer. (Toffer, Jared) |
Filing 24 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #9 filed by Plaintiff Todd Meyer. (Toffer, Jared) |
Filing 23 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #19 Non-Resident Attorney Nathan L. Colvin APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Fifth Third Bank, Defendant, designating Larry M. Arnold as local counsel. (twdb) |
Filing 22 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #18 Non-Resident Attorney Nathaniel Lampley Jr. APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Fifth Third Bank, Defendant, designating Larry M. Arnold as local counsel. (twdb) |
Filing 21 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. Motion set for hearing on 12/2/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Proposed Order) (Arnold, Larry) |
Filing 20 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 1/13/2020 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (dgo) |
Filing 19 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Nathaniel Lytle Colvin to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Fifth Third Bank (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24687061) filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Arnold, Larry) |
Filing 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Nathaniel Lampley Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Fifth Third Bank (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24686991) filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Arnold, Larry) |
Filing 17 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Larry M Arnold counsel for Defendant Fifth Third Bank. Adding Cecilia J. Hong as counsel of record for Fifth Third Bank for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Arnold, Larry) |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. correcting Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #15 Errata to Declaration of Nathaniel Lampley, Jr. Correcting Exhibit A (Arnold, Larry) |
Filing 15 Opposition Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #9 filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Nathaniel Lampley, Jr.)(Arnold, Larry) |
Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Larry M Arnold counsel for Defendant Fifth Third Bank. Adding Larry M. Arnold as counsel of record for Fifth Third Bank for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Attorney Larry M Arnold added to party Fifth Third Bank(pty:dft))(Arnold, Larry) |
Filing 13 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #9 . The Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for 11/18/2019 is removed from the calendar and the motion is taken under submission. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 Text Only Order VACATING Order to Show Cause #7 by Judge David O. Carter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Todd Meyerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines #7 (Toffer, Jared) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Todd Meyer, identifying 1.FBO Hogan M. Meyer UGMA; 2.Conrad F. Hohener, III and Debra Larue Hohener Trustees Under Agreement of Trust dated February 3, 1987; 3.FBO Kelly K. Meyer UGMA; 4.FBO Nolan M. Meyer UGMA; 5.FBO Wilson P. Meyer UGMA; 6.Gordon Meyer & Marjorie M. Meyer Trustees of the 3-M Trust Under Agreement dated February 11, 1983; 7. Mark Eisele; 8. Brian Thune; 9. Scott E. Bain; 10. Michael J. Purcell; 11. Khoi H. Vuong; 12. Todd Meyer; 13. Todd R. and Erin P. Meyer, as Co-Trustees of the Meyer Living Trust, Established October 30, 2001; 14. Mark H. Campbell; 15. Mark Dardis; 16. Laurie Campos; 17. OBrien Trust Dated January 2, 1996; 18. Meyer Dynasty Trust, Established December 10, 2012. (Toffer, Jared) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court filed by plaintiff Todd Meyer. Motion set for hearing on 11/18/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Jared M. Toffer Declaration, #3 Todd Meyer Declaration, #4 Proposed Order) (Toffer, Jared) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Todd Meyer, upon Defendant Fifth Third Bank served on 10/11/2019, answer due 11/1/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Toffer, Jared) |
Filing 7 [VACATED 10/21/2019 SEE DKT. #12] MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Show Cause Response due by 10/21/2019. (twdb) Modified on 10/21/2019 (dgo). |
Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-50, inclusive, Fifth Third Bank., filed by plaintiff Todd Meyer. (FILED IN STATE COURT 9/6/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank identifying Fifth Third Bancorp. as Corporate Parent. (McCormick, Thomas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (McCormick, Thomas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County, case number 30-2019-01096178 Receipt No: 0973-24475400 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Thomas N McCormick added to party Fifth Third Bank(pty:dft))(McCormick, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.