Voice Control Vehicles, LLC v. Best Choice Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Voice Control Vehicles, LLC
Defendant: Best Choice Products, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2019cv01807
Filed: September 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S Gutierrez
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2019 Filing 20 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Grochocinski, Timothy)
October 7, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Grochocinski, Timothy)
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: granting #9 Non-Resident Attorney Timothy E Grochocinski APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC, designating Brandon C Fernald as local counsel. (bm)
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: granting #8 Non-Resident Attorney Joseph P Oldaker APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC, designating Brandon C Fernald as local counsel. (bm)
September 27, 2019 Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Best Choice Products, Inc. (bm)
September 26, 2019 Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #14 filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Fernald, Brandon)
September 26, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Request for Clerk to Issue Summons #13 . The following error(s) was found: Attached document appears to be a Request for Clerk to Issue Summons, not a Summons Returned Unexecuted. Incorrect docketing event. Correct event is Service Documents-Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints-Summons Request. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (bm)
September 25, 2019 Filing 13 Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. as to Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Fernald, Brandon)
September 25, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #11 . The following error(s) was found: Case number with judges initials should be indicated in caption of summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (bm)
September 24, 2019 Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #6 filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Fernald, Brandon)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
September 23, 2019 Filing 9 First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Timothy E. Grochocinski to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24487163) filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Fernald, Brandon)
September 23, 2019 Filing 8 First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Joseph P. Oldaker to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24486534) filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Fernald, Brandon)
September 23, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet, 2 summons, 3 Patent Report, 4 Notice to Interested Parties are attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap)
September 23, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Please put for the Central District of California. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap)
September 23, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Joseph P Oldaker. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap)
September 23, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Timothy E Grochocinski. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap)
September 23, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
September 23, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap)
September 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24478659 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 summons, #3 Patent Report, #4 Notice to Interested Parties) (Attorney Brandon C Fernald added to party Voice Control Vehicles, LLC(pty:pla))(Fernald, Brandon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Voice Control Vehicles, LLC v. Best Choice Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Best Choice Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Voice Control Vehicles, LLC
Represented By: Brandon C Fernald
Represented By: Timothy E Grochocinski
Represented By: Joseph P Oldaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?