Voice Control Vehicles, LLC v. Contixo, Inc
| Voice Control Vehicles, LLC |
| Contixo, Inc |
| 8:2019cv01808 |
| September 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE (JS-6) by Judge John A Kronstadt: In light of the parties' Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, the Court orders the case dismissed without prejudice and vacates all deadlines and dates. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jre) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Grochocinski, Timothy) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC, upon Defendant Contixo, Inc served on 10/8/2019, answer due 10/29/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Puji Sui, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Grochocinski, Timothy) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Grochocinski, Timothy) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Contixo, Inc. (jp) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Deficiency in Attorney Case Opening - optional html form, #6 filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Fernald, Brandon) |
| Filing 10 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Fernald, Brandon) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: granting #5 Non-Resident Attorney Timothy E Grochocinski APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC, designating Brandon C Fernald as local counsel. (jp)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: granting #4 Non-Resident Attorney Joseph P Oldaker APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC, designating Brandon C Fernald as local counsel. (jp)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Attachments No. #1 Civil Cover, #2 Summons Request, #3 Patent Report, and #4 Notice of Interested Parties Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. #1. Each document should have been filed separately. (jp) |
| Filing 5 First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Timothy E. Grochocinski to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24487376) filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Fernald, Brandon) |
| Filing 4 First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Joseph P. Oldaker to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24487271) filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Fernald, Brandon) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jp) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24478909 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Voice Control Vehicles, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 summons, #3 Patent Report, #4 Notice to Interested Parties) (Attorney Brandon C Fernald added to party Voice Control Vehicles, LLC(pty:pla))(Fernald, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Voice Control Vehicles, LLC v. Contixo, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Contixo, Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Voice Control Vehicles, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Brandon C Fernald |
| Represented By: | Timothy E Grochocinski |
| Represented By: | Joseph P Oldaker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
