Bryan Williams v. Raymond Perez Cobb et al
Plaintiff: Bryan Williams
Defendant: Phanny's Restaurant, Raymond Perez Cobb, Patricia Marie Cobb, Does 1-10, inclusive and Phannys Restaurant
Case Number: 8:2019cv01810
Filed: September 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: granting #11 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to All Defendants.( The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 1/14/2020.) The court sets the a status conference for 1/9/2020 at 8:30 a.m.. The scheduling conference set for 12/19/2019 is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. (yl)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. (Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/5/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 12/19/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
November 4, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Phannys Restaurant, (Gaugh, Kenneth)
November 4, 2019 Filing 12 First APPLICATION to Stay pending Completion of Mediation Order #8 filed by Defendant Phannys Restaurant. Application set for hearing on 12/16/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Gaugh, Kenneth)
November 4, 2019 Filing 11 First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Phannys Restaurant. Application set for hearing on 12/16/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Gaugh, Kenneth)
November 4, 2019 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Phannys Restaurant.(Attorney Kenneth Ray Gaugh added to party Phannys Restaurant(pty:dft))(Gaugh, Kenneth)
October 24, 2019 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant Phannys Restaurant served on 10/14/2019, answer due 11/4/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Phanny's Restaurant by Betty Bautista, Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
September 24, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Patricia Marie Cobb, Raymond Perez Cobb, Phannys Restaurant. (lh)
September 24, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
September 24, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh)
September 23, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross)
September 23, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, (Cornell, Ross)
September 23, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross)
September 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24480233 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Bryan Williams(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryan Williams v. Raymond Perez Cobb et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phanny's Restaurant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raymond Perez Cobb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia Marie Cobb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phannys Restaurant
Represented By: Kenneth Ray Gaugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bryan Williams
Represented By: Ross Cornell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?