Arthur Lopez v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. et al
Arthur Lopez |
HSBC Holdings PLC, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., James Brien Comey, Jr. and The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited |
8:2019cv01816 |
September 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
John F Walter |
Real Property: Other |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th CIRCUIT filed by Plaintiff Arthur Lopez. Amending Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #10 Filed On: 10/2/19; Entered On: 10/3/19. (mat) |
Filing 14 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION #9 by Judge John F. Walter. Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED. (iv) |
Filing 13 ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #10 filed by Arthur Lopez. CCA # 19-56169. The October 2, 2019 notice of appeal is ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending October 2, 2019 motion. The (9th CCA) Clerk shall serve this order on the district court.[See document for all details.] (mat) |
Filing 12 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 19-56169 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #10 as to Petitioner Arthur Lopez. (iv) |
Filing 11 FILING FEE LETTER issued as to plaintiff Arthur Lopez, re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #10 . (mat) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by Petitioner Arthur Lopez. Appeal of Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), #8 Filed On: 9/30/19; Entered On: 9/30/19; Filing fee $ 505 BILLED. (mat) |
Filing 9 PLAINTIFF, ARTHUR LOPEZ'S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION re Order #8 filed by Plaintiff Arthur Lopez. (iv) |
Filing 8 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: This case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (iv) |
RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott Re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(jdo) |
Filing 7 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Arthur Lopez. (car) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Arthur Lopez (car) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants James Brien Comey, Jr, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC Holdings PLC, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Arthur Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.