Keith Moser v. Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Keith Moser
Defendant: Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2019cv01823
Filed: September 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: James V Selna
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTES [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER VACATING MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge James V. Selna: On October 28, 2019, Plaintiff Keith Moser filed a First Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 11. The Court therefore VACATES the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss set for November 18, 2019 (Dkt. No. 8) as MOOT. (es)
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO PERMIT THE FILING OF PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AFTER THE FRCP 15 DEADLINE AND TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #12 by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint shall be deemed filed on October 28, 2019 and that Defendants deadline to file and serve its response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint shall be extended to November 27, 2019. (es)
October 29, 2019 Filing 12 STIPULATION for Leave to To Permit The Filing Of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint After The FRCP 15 Deadline And To Extend Defendants Time To Respond To Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Stipulation To Permit The Filing Of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint After The FRCP 15 Deadline And To Extend Defendants Time To Respond To Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint)(Cohon, Jeffrey)
October 28, 2019 Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Plaintiff Keith Moser amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiff Keith Moser(Uzoh, Azuka)
October 8, 2019 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc., identifying CCMSI Holdings, Inc.. (Cohon, Jeffrey)
September 30, 2019 Filing 9 DECLARATION of Jeffrey M Cohon Re Meet and Confer Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), or in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to FRCP 12(e) #8 filed by Defendant Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.. (Cohon, Jeffrey)
September 30, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), or in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to FRCP 12(e) filed by Defendant Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 11/18/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge James V. Selna. (Cohon, Jeffrey)
September 26, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE to Plaintiff of Initial Order Following Filing of Complaint Assigned to Judge Selna filed by Defendant Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.. (Cohon, Jeffrey)
September 25, 2019 Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
September 24, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
September 24, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh)
September 24, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Autumn D. Spaeth. New Case Number 8:19-cv-01823 JVS (ADSx). (lh)
September 23, 2019 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc., Does 1 through 100. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Keith Moser. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/19/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
September 23, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.. (Cohon, Jeffrey)
September 23, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2019-01091224 Receipt No: 0973-24483461 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.. (Attorney Jeffrey Michael Cohon added to party Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Cohon, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keith Moser v. Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Moser
Represented By: Azuka L Uzoh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey Michael Cohon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?