In Re: Seunghwan Jeong et al
Appellee: Seunghwan Jeong and Seung Hwan Jeong
Not Yet Classified: Amy Park Jeong and Hyekyung Park
Appellant: Jin Ree
Case Number: 8:2019cv01826
Filed: September 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #2 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: GRANTED. (iv)
September 25, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Appellant Jin Ree. (car)
September 25, 2019 Filing 1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT ORDER TRANSFERRING IFP MOTION. Appellant filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with respect to this appeal ("IFP Motion"). An order was issued by the BAP Clerk, giving the bankruptcy court the opportunity to make a certification under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) regarding whether the appeal is frivolous. The bankruptcy court did not make a certification regarding whether the appeal is frivolous. Under the holding of Perroton v. Gray (In re Perroton), 958 F.2d889(9th Cir. 1992) and Determan v. Sandoval (In re Sandoval), 186 B.R. 490, 496 (9th Cir. BAP 1995), The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has no authority to grant or deny in forma pauperis motions under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) because bankruptcy courts are not "court[s] of the United States" as defined in 28 U.S.C. 451. Therefore, appellant's IFP Motion is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of California for the limited purpose of ruling on the IFP Motion. [See order for further details] (Attachments: #1 BAP Docket) (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Seunghwan Jeong et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Seunghwan Jeong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Seung Hwan Jeong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: Amy Park Jeong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: Hyekyung Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Jin Ree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?