Jonh Kneisley v. Synchrony Bank et al
| Jonh Kneisley |
| Synchrony Bank and Does 1-20 |
| 8:2019cv01853 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference is set for 12/20/2019 at 10:30 a.m. See document for details. (tg)
|
| Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Court is in receipt of Defendants Supplement to Notice of Removal in response to the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause issued October 31, 2019 is hereby DISCHARGED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Synchrony Bank. (Kassabian, Raffi) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Counsel is hereby ordered to show cause in writing no later than November 7, 2019, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
| Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:19-cv-01853 JLS(KESx). (rn) Modified on 10/15/2019 (rn). |
| Filing 8 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Synchrony Bank. (Kassabian, Raffi) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Jonh Kneisley. (Loker, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jonh Kneisley, (Loker, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-20, inclusive, Synchrony Bank. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Jonh Kneisley. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/26/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Synchrony Bank, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 09/27/2019. (Kassabian, Raffi) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Synchrony Bank, identifying Synchrony Financial. Synchrony Financial. (Kassabian, Raffi) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Synchrony Bank. (Kassabian, Raffi) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from California, case number 30-2019-01093062-CL-NP Receipt No: 0973-24517655 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Synchrony Bank. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons and Superior Ct Civil Cover) (Attorney Raffi Kassabian added to party Synchrony Bank(pty:dft))(Kassabian, Raffi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
