Nagui Mankaruse v. Intel Corporation
| Nagui Mankaruse |
| Matthew Robert Hulse, Daniel Patrick Docter, Acer America Corporation, DOES 1-10, inclusive, Intel Corporation, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and Andy D. Bryant |
| 8:2019cv01902 |
| October 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 145 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge David O. Carter: Denying #18 MOTION to Dismiss as Moot. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb) |
| Filing 20 AMENDED COMPLAINT against plaintiff Acer America Corporation, Andy D. Bryant, DOES, Daniel Patrick Docter, Matthew Robert Hulse, Intel Corporation amending Complaint - (Discovery), #1 , filed by plaintiff Nagui Mankaruse(twdb) |
|
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Acer America Corporation, Andy D. Bryant, Daniel Patrick Docter, Matthew Robert Hulse, Intel Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 1/13/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Peter Gratzinger, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proof of Service) (Attorney Peter E Gratzinger added to party Acer America Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Peter E Gratzinger added to party Andy D. Bryant(pty:dft), Attorney Peter E Gratzinger added to party Daniel Patrick Docter (pty:dft), Attorney Peter E Gratzinger added to party Matthew Robert Hulse(pty:dft), Attorney Peter E Gratzinger added to party Intel Corporation(pty:dft)) (Gratzinger, Peter) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nagui Mankaruse, upon Defendant Intel Corporation mailed on 10/15/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Original Summons NOT returned. (twdb) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nagui Mankaruse, upon Defendant Acer America Corporation mailed on 10/15/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Original Summons NOT returned. (twdb) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nagui Mankaruse, upon Defendant Daniel Patrick Docter mailed on on 10/15/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daniel Patrick Docter in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Original Summons NOT returned. (twdb) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nagui Mankaruse, upon Defendant Matthew Robert Hulse mailed on 10/15/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Matthew Robert Hulse in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Original Summons NOT returned. (twdb) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nagui Mankaruse, upon Defendant Andy D. Bryant mailed on 10/15/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Andy D. Bryant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Original Summons NOT returned. (twdb) Modified on 10/18/2019 (twdb). |
|
|
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 Matthew Robert Hulse C/O defendant Intel Corporation. (twdb) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Andy D. Bryant, C/O Defendant, Intel Corporation. (twdb) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to defendant Acer America Corporation. (twdb) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to defendant Daniel Patrick Docter. (twdb) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to defendant Intel Corporation. (twdb) |
|
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(mba) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Nagui Mankaruse. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nagui Mankaruse. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Nagui Mankaruse against Defendants Acer America Corporation, Daniel Patrick Docter, Matthew Robert Hulse, Intel Corporation.Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.