Raymond James and Associates, Inc. v. Terran Orbital Corporation
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Raymond James and Associates, Inc. |
Terran Orbital Corporation |
8:2019cv01916 |
October 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Karen E Scott |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. § 0009 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Vacate Order on Motion for Order #23 filed by Defendant Terran Orbital Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 1/6/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration and Exhibits, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proof of Service) (Attorney Eric Steven Engel added to party Terran Orbital Corporation(pty:res)) (Engel, Eric) |
Filing 24 OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for SETTING UNIFIED HEARING DATE ON ARBITRATION-RELATED PETITION AND MOTION #22 filed by Petitioner Raymond James and Associates, Inc.. (Katzman, Steven) |
Filing 23 ORDER SETTING PETITION RELATED HEARING DATE by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #22 EX PARTE APPLICATION. Hearing continued to 1/6/2020 at 8:30 a.m. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb) |
Filing 22 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for SETTING UNIFIED HEARING DATE ON ARBITRATION-RELATED PETITION AND MOTION filed by Respondent Terran Orbital Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Evan Pitchford added to party Terran Orbital Corporation(pty:res)) (Pitchford, Evan) |
Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Raymond James and Associates, Inc., re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Enforce and Confirm Arbitration Award #18 via overnight delivery served on 10/18/19. (Bisconti, Anthony) |
Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Raymond James and Associates, Inc., re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Enforce and Confirm Arbitration Award #18 personally served on 10/18/19. (Bisconti, Anthony) |
Filing 19 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #16 Non-Resident Attorney Joshua C. Webb APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Raymond James and Associates, Inc., Petitioner, designating Anthony R. Bisconti as local counsel. (twdb) |
Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Enforce and Confirm Arbitration Award filed by Petitioner Raymond James and Associates, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 11/18/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Bisconti, Anthony) |
Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Raymond James and Associates, Inc., upon Defendant Terran Orbital Corporation served on 10/8/2019, answer due 10/29/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Rachel Daddario- Human Resources in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bisconti, Anthony) |
Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Joshua C. Webb to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Petitioner Raymond James and Associates, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Previously Paid on 10/8/2019, Receipt No. 0973-24573181) filed by Petitioner Raymond James and Associates, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bisconti, Anthony) |
Filing 15 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter re APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Joshua C. Webb to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Petitioner Raymond James and Associates, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24573181) #12 . The following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order for the following reason(s): Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed. (rrp) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Joshua C. Webb to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Petitioner Raymond James and Associates, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24573181) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed. (lt) |
Filing 13 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (rrp) |
Filing 12 (STRICKEN, SEE DOCKET NUMBER #15 ) --- APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Joshua C. Webb to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Petitioner Raymond James and Associates, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24573181) filed by Petitioner Raymond James and Associates, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bisconti, Anthony) Modified on 10/10/2019 (rrp). |
Filing 11 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Case transferred from Judge Josephine L. Staton to the calendar of Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 8:19-cv-01916 DOC(KESx). (rn) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Terran Orbital Corporation. (car) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Joshua C Webb. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Steven Jay Katzman counsel for Petitioner Raymond James & Associates, Inc.. Adding Steven Jay Katzman as counsel of record for Petitioner, Raymond James & Associates, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Counsel for Petitioner, Steven Jay Katzman. (Attorney Steven Jay Katzman added to party Raymond James & Associates, Inc.(pty:pet))(Katzman, Steven) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Petitioner Raymond James & Associates, Inc.. (Bisconti, Anthony) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Petitioner Raymond James & Associates, Inc. identifying Raymond James Financial, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Bisconti, Anthony) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Raymond James & Associates, Inc., (Bisconti, Anthony) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Raymond James & Associates, Inc.. (Bisconti, Anthony) |
Filing 1 PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD Receipt No: 0973-24557336 - Fee: $400, filed by Petitioner Raymond James & Associates, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Declaration of Joshua C. Webb, #8 Proposed Order) (Attorney Anthony R Bisconti added to party Raymond James & Associates, Inc.(pty:pet))(Bisconti, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.