Michael Erbe v. Optum Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Michael Erbe
Defendant: Optum Services, Inc., Does 1-25, Does 2-25, OptumRX, Inc. and Doe
Case Number: 8:2019cv01954
Filed: October 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO BINDING ARBITRATION AND TO DISMISS PENDING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE #7 by Judge James V. Selna. The Court hereby approves the Joint Stipulation To Binding Arbitration And To Dismiss Pending Action Without Prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
October 22, 2019 Filing 7 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Binding Arbitration filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Lyftogt, Marissa)
October 22, 2019 Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
October 17, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
October 17, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap)
October 15, 2019 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-25, Optum Services, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Michael Erbe. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/18/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
October 15, 2019 NON CONFORM COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Michael Erbe, upon Defendant Optum Services, Inc. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 6/5/2019, answer due 6/26/2019. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Christina Semmer, Attorney for defendant Optum Services, Inc. SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B) (ghap)
October 15, 2019 AMENDED COMPLAINT amending Complaint - (Discovery) plaintiff being ignorant of the true name of the defendant and having designated the defendant in the complaint by the fictitious name of DOE 1 and having discovered the true name of the defendant to be Optum Services, Inc., filed by plaintiff Michael Erbe. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/24/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D)(ghap) Modified on 10/17/2019 (ghap).
October 15, 2019 CONFORMED FILED COPY REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL as to Defendant OptumRX, Inc. Without prejudice filed by plaintiff Michael Erbe. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/24/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D) (ghap)
October 15, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc., identifying Optum, Inc., UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Semmer, Christina)
October 15, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Semmer, Christina)
October 15, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2019-01058046-CU-OE-CJC Receipt No: 0973-24608473 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Susan A. Weedman, #2 Exhibit 1 to Weedman Declaration, #3 Declaration of Christina C.K. Semmer, #4 Exhibit A to Semmer Declaration, #5 Exhibit B to Semmer Declaration, #6 Exhibit C to Semmer Declaration, #7 Exhibit D to Semmer Declaration, #8 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Christina C K Semmer added to party Optum Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Semmer, Christina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael Erbe v. Optum Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Optum Services, Inc.
Represented By: Christina C K Semmer
Represented By: Marissa L Lyftogt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 2-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OptumRX, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe
Represented By: Christina C K Semmer
Represented By: Marissa L Lyftogt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Erbe
Represented By: Abraham H Tang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?