Mercedes Cheatham v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. et al
Mercedes Cheatham |
RRA CP OPPORTUNITY TRUST 1, Real Time Resolutions, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive |
8:2019cv01956 |
October 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Jean P. Rosenbluth. New Case Number 2:19-cv-08911-CAS-JPRx. (car) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, COMPTON DISTRICT, case number 19CMCV00274 with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 10/15/19, receipt number 0973-24609935), filed by Defendant RRA CP OPPORTUNITY TRUST 1, Real Time Resolutions, Inc..(Lucey, Nathaniel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, COMPTON DISTRICT, case number 19CMCV00274 Receipt No: 0973-24609935 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant RRA CP OPPORTUNITY TRUST 1, Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. (Attorney Nathaniel R Lucey added to party RRA CP OPPORTUNITY TRUST 1(pty:dft), Attorney Nathaniel R Lucey added to party Real Time Resolutions, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lucey, Nathaniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.