BE Labs, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Incorporated
Plaintiff: BE Labs, Inc.
Defendant: D-Link Systems, Incorporated
Case Number: 8:2019cv01995
Filed: October 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER RE UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #20 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court finds good cause has been shown to GRANT the Request. The deadline for Defendant to respond to complaint is extended to January 15, 2020. (lom)
December 9, 2019 Filing 20 REQUEST to Extend Time to File Answer to 1/15/2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant D-Link Systems, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Yang, Christine)
December 5, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christine Hwang Yang on behalf of Defendant D-Link Systems, Incorporated (Attorney Christine Hwang Yang added to party D-Link Systems, Incorporated(pty:dft))(Yang, Christine)
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Re Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint By Not More Than 30 Days (L.R. 8-3) #17 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. For these reasons, although leave of the Court is unnecessary in order to set the deadline as 12/16/2019, the Stipulation is APPROVED. (jp)
November 9, 2019 Filing 17 STIPULATION for Order answer complaint filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bright, Patrick)
November 7, 2019 Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to D-Link Systems, Incorporated answer now due 12/16/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc..(Bright, Patrick)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File answer to complaint #14 , for the following reasons: (1) Incorrect event selected. Correct event is: Civil Events - Other Filings - Stipulations - Extending Time to Answer; (2) The document is titled as a Stipulation but filed as an Application, which is set for hearing on November 12, 2019. Pursuant to the Court's Standing Order, applications are not set for hearing. Plaintiff shall refer to LR. 8-3 and file the appropriate stipulation using the correct event code. The stipulation shall be approved and signed by both parties. The 11/12/2019 hearing is vacated. (jp)
November 6, 2019 Filing 14 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 11/6/2019, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #15 ] - APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File answer to complaint filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. Application set for hearing on 11/12/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Bright, Patrick) Modified on 11/6/2019 (jp).
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File answer to complaint #12 , for the following reasons: Pursuant to the Court's Standing Order, applications are not set for hearing. Plaintiff shall refer to L.R. 8-3 and file the appropriate stipulation. The November 6, 2019 hearing is vacated. (jp)
November 5, 2019 Filing 12 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED 11/5/2019, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #13 ]] - APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File answer to complaint filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. Application set for hearing on 11/6/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bright, Patrick) Modified on 11/5/2019 (jp).
October 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake)
October 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:19-cv-02636 JAK(ASx). Case transferred from Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:19-cv-01995 JAK(ASx). Signed by Judge John A. Kronstadt (rn)
October 21, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Isaac P Rabicoff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
October 21, 2019 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant D-Link Systems, Incorporated. (et)
October 21, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
October 21, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (et)
October 18, 2019 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by BE Labs, Inc.. (Bright, Patrick)
October 18, 2019 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Bright, Patrick)
October 18, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc., identifying none. (Bright, Patrick)
October 18, 2019 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Bright, Patrick)
October 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24633549 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Attorney Patrick F Bright added to party BE Labs, Inc.(pty:pla))(Bright, Patrick)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BE Labs, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BE Labs, Inc.
Represented By: Patrick F Bright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D-Link Systems, Incorporated
Represented By: Christine Hwang Yang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?