Salvador Castro v. Orange County Sheriffs Dept et al
| Salvador Castro |
| Orange County Sheriffs Dept and Sheriff Don Barnes |
| 8:2019cv02051 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued as to defendant Don Barnes. Re Amended Complaint #5 (vm) |
Filing 8
ORDER TO UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE RE: SERVICE OF PROCESS by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service is authorized to proceed with service of process without prepayment of cost upon the following defendant(s) only: 1. Orange County Sheriff Don Barnes, in his official capacity only. (See Order for further details) (vm)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), service of the summons and complaint must be accomplished on each named defendant within 90 days after the filing of the complaint. The 90-day period will expire on March 10, 2020. (See Minute Order for further details) (vm)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is hereby GRANTED. 20% of average monthly costs per statute. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915, the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the total filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $3.00 must be paid within thirty (30) days of the date this order is filed. Failure to remit the initial partial filing fee may result in dismissal of the case. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). re APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #2 (vm)
|
| Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Don Barnes, Orange County Sheriffs Dept filed by plaintiff Salvador Castro. Amending Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 , (vm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer Denying #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee: IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Reason: Frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, with leave to amend within 30 days. (bm)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval. Re APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #2 . (vm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By A Prisoner filed by Plaintiff Salvador Castro. (et) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Don Barnes, Orange County Sheriffs Dept pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner., filed by Plaintiff Salvador Castro. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
