Cassiopeia IP LLC v. Yamaha Corporation of America
Cassiopeia IP LLC |
Yamaha Corporation of America |
8:2019cv02065 |
October 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Douglas F McCormick |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Having considered Plaintiff Cassiopeia IP LLCs (Cassiopeia) Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer Complaint, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs request is GRANTED and Defendant, Yamaha Corporation of America, shall have through and including January 9, 2020 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. (yl) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 9, 2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Cassiopeia IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 10 ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew S. Curfman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Cassiopeia IP LLC, designating Ryan E. Hatch as local counsel #9 . (iv) |
Filing 9 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Andrew S. Curfman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Cassiopeia IP LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24713196) filed by Plaintiff Cassiopeia IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Yamaha Corporation of America. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Cassiopeia IP LLC (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Cassiopeia IP LLC. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Cassiopeia IP LLC. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Cassiopeia IP LLC. (Hatch, Ryan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24697496 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Cassiopeia IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Ryan E Hatch added to party Cassiopeia IP LLC(pty:pla))(Hatch, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cassiopeia IP LLC v. Yamaha Corporation of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Yamaha Corporation of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cassiopeia IP LLC | |
Represented By: | Ryan E Hatch |
Represented By: | Andrew S Curfman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.