Judy Gompf et al v. Monterey Financial Services LLC
| Kaila Jackson and Judy Gompf |
| Does 1-10, and Each of Them and Monterey Financial Services LLC |
| 8:2019cv02071 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 stand upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Monterey Financial Services LLC. (jp) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jp) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Kaila Jackson(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Judy Gompf. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Judy Gompf. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24704870 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Judy Gompf. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Judy Gompf(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
