Martha Johnson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Martha Johnson |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., DOES 1-10, inclusive and Affinia Default Services, LLC |
8:2019cv02149 |
November 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
Josephine L Staton |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Affinia Default Services, LLC, (Zuberi, Nabeel) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Joinder and Joinder in Defendant Wells Fargo's Motion to Dismiss #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Other error(s) with document(s): (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference is set for 1/24/2020 at 10:30 A.M.before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (tg) |
Filing 11 JOINDER in NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint #9 filed by Defendant Affinia Default Services, LLC. (Zuberi, Nabeel) |
Filing 10 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint #9 filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (La, D) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Motion set for hearing on 1/24/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (La, D) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nabeel M Zuberi counsel for Defendant Affinia Default Services, LLC. Adding Nabeel M. Zuberi as counsel of record for Affinia Default Services, LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Affinia Default Services, LLC. (Attorney Nabeel M Zuberi added to party Affinia Default Services, LLC(pty:dft))(Zuberi, Nabeel) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Affinia Default Services, LLC, Does 1-10, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Martha Johnson. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/03/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Filing 4 JOINDER filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. joining in Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . (La, D) |
Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., identifying Wells Fargo and Company. (La, D) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (La, D) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2019-01102286-CU-OR-CJC Receipt No: 0973-24745481 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attorney D Dennis La added to party Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(La, D) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.