ABC Services Group, Inc. v. Golden Rule Insurance Company
| ABC Services Group, Inc. |
| Golden Rule Insurance Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 8:2019cv02183 |
| November 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Insurance |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Text Only Order STRIKING Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #13 , Stipulation ExtendMINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #12 by Judge David O. Carter re ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES. All future filings shall be filed only under the low number case, SA CV 19-0243- DOC (DFMx). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 13 [STRICKEN ON 12/4/2019 SEE DKT. #14] NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Golden Rule Insurance Company, identifying Golden Rule Financial Corporation; UnitedHealth Group, Incorporated. (Glassman, Daniel) Modified on 12/4/2019 (dgo). |
| Filing 12 [STRICKEN 12/4/2019 SEE DKT. #14] STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Golden Rule Insurance Company answer now due 1/3/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Golden Rule Insurance Company.(Attorney Daniel M Glassman added to party Golden Rule Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Glassman, Daniel) Modified on 12/4/2019 (dgo). |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES. All future filings shall be filed only under the low number case, SA CV 19-0243- DOC (DFMx). Cases associated with Lead Case SACV19-243 DOC(DFMx), Made JS-6. Case Terminated. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:19-cv-00243 DOC(DFMx). Case transferred from Judge James V. Selna to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:19-cv-02183 DOC(DFMx). Signed by Judge David O. Carter (rn)
|
| Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Golden Rule Insurance Company. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff ABC Services Group, Inc.. Related Case(s): 8:19-cv-00243-DOC-DFM and 8:19-cv-01342-DOC-DFM (Garner, Craig) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff ABC Services Group, Inc.. (Garner, Craig) |
| Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff ABC Services Group, Inc., identifying ABC Services Group, Inc. and Morningside Recovery, LLC. (Garner, Craig) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ABC Services Group, Inc.. (Garner, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24761401 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff ABC Services Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Craig B Garner added to party ABC Services Group, Inc.(pty:pla))(Garner, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
