TCT Mobile (US) Inc. et al v. Ancora Technologies, Inc.
| TCT Mobile (US) Inc. and Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. |
| Ancora Technologies, Inc. |
| 8:2019cv02192 |
| November 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney William E Thomson, Jr on behalf of Defendant Ancora Technologies, Inc. (Attorney William E Thomson, Jr added to party Ancora Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft))(Thomson, William) |
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint #13 by Judge Josephine L. Staton that Ancora Technologies, Inc., shall have up to and including 1/15/2020 to answer or otherwise respond to TCT Mobile (US) Inc., and Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd.'s Complaint for Declaratory Judgment. (jp)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 01/15/2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ancora Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ancora Technologies, Inc. answer now due 1/8/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ancora Technologies, Inc..(Smith, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christopher C Smith on behalf of Defendant Ancora Technologies, Inc. (Attorney Christopher C Smith added to party Ancora Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft))(Smith, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff TCT Mobile (US) Inc., Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd., upon Defendant Ancora Technologies, Inc. served on 11/18/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Schnurer, John) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Ancora Technologies, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd., TCT Mobile (US) Inc.. (Schnurer, John) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiffs Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd., TCT Mobile (US) Inc. (Schnurer, John) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd., TCT Mobile (US) Inc.. (Schnurer, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd., TCT Mobile (US) Inc.. (Schnurer, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24767197 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff TCT Mobile (US) Inc., Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney John P Schnurer added to party Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.(pty:pla), Attorney John P Schnurer added to party TCT Mobile (US) Inc. (pty:pla))(Schnurer, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
