Bryan Williams v. KQ Elements et al
Bryan Williams |
KQ Elements, KQ Center and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
8:2019cv02261 |
November 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Josephine L Staton |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Counsel is hereby ordered to show cause in writing no later than 1/13/2020, why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41, for lack of prosecution. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION). (jp) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant KQ Elements served on 12/6/2019, answer due 12/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon KQ Elements by Justine Ramirez, Person in charge in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant KQ Center served on 12/6/2019, answer due 12/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon KQ Center by Justine Ramirez, Person in Charge in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 12 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On 12/5/2019, Plaintiff voluntarily withdrew that claim. (Doc. #11 .) Accordingly, the Court DISCHARGES the Order to Show Cause. (jp) |
Filing 11 WITHDRAWAL of filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tg) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg) |
Filing 8 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. Failure to respond may, without further warning, result in dismissal of the entire action without prejudice. (jp) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants KQ Center and KQ Elements. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24814151 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Bryan Williams(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.