Linda J. Barris v. Social Security Administration
Mrs. Linda J Barris and Linda J Barris |
Social Security Administration |
8:2019cv02262 |
November 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Linda J Barris, upon Defendant Social Security Administration served on 12/4/2019, answer due 4/2/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to F DelaRosa. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Emily Sase. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to illegible. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth for all further proceedings. Please use the case number SACV19-2262 JPR on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Social Security Administration. (Attorney Marla K Letellier added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft))(Letellier, Marla) |
Filing 10 STATEMENT Lack of Conflict filed by Plaintiff Linda J Barris re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #8 . (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Plaintiff must electronically file a proof of service showing compliance with this paragraph within 30 days of the date of this order or as soon as service is timely completed.(See document for details. (sbou) |
Filing 8 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order re Possible Conflicts of Interest by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. No later than seven days from the date of this order, Plaintiff's counsel must file notice that ALJ Rosenbluth did or did not participate in or preside over Plaintiff's case. (See document for details.) (sbou) |
Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Linda J Barris. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Social Security Administration. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Linda J Barris. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Linda J Barris, (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Linda J Barris. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24814894 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Linda J Barris. (Attorney Troy Dana Monge added to party Linda J Barris(pty:pla))(Monge, Troy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.