Sam Kim v. Harjinder Kaur Saini et al
SAM KIM |
DOES 1 through 10, HARJINDER KAUR SAINI, UKC LLC and Harjinder Kaur Saini doing business as A B Liquor Market |
8:2019cv02273 |
November 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
Otis D Wright |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court has reviewed the Response filed by Plaintiff and Plaintiffs counsel to the Courts Order to Show Cause. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act claim and any other construction-related state accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claim without prejudice. (lc) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Sam Kimto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #9 re Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information.The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing onthe voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than December 13, 2019. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and the dismissal of those claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (lc) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 as to Defendants Harjinder Kaur Saini, UKC LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff SAM KIM, (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff SAM KIM. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by plaintiff SAM KIM. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 11/21/2019, receipt number 097324824699), filed by plaintiff SAM KIM. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party SAM KIM(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: You have attempted to open this case electronically but have failed to upload successfully the required PDF version of any initiating document, such as a complaint or notice of removal. You must file an initiating document within two business days of this notice or the docket for this case number will be closed. A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.