David Deivasigamani et al v. Transworld Systems, Inc.
| David Deivasigamani and Hazel Stanley |
| Transworld Systems, Inc. and NCC Business Services, Inc. |
| 8:2019cv02282 |
| November 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 3/30/2020 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Transworld Systems, Inc., identifying Aston Acquisition Corp.. (Kirkpatrick, Debbie) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Transworld Systems, Inc..(Kirkpatrick, Debbie) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Transworld Systems, Inc. answer now due 1/10/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Transworld Systems, Inc..(Attorney Debbie P Kirkpatrick added to party Transworld Systems, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kirkpatrick, Debbie) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff David Deivasigamani, Hazel Stanley, upon Defendant Transworld Systems, Inc. served on 12/6/2019, answer due 12/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System - Gabriela Sanchez - Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Veggian, Lauren) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:19-cv-02282 PSG (ADSx). (esa)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:19-cv-2282 CBM (ADSx). (esa)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Transworld Systems, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs David Deivasigamani, Hazel Stanley, (Veggian, Lauren) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiffs David Deivasigamani, Hazel Stanley. (Veggian, Lauren) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs David Deivasigamani, Hazel Stanley. (Veggian, Lauren) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24837254 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiffs David Deivasigamani, Hazel Stanley. (Attorney Lauren B Veggian added to party David Deivasigamani(pty:pla), Attorney Lauren B Veggian added to party Hazel Stanley(pty:pla))(Veggian, Lauren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
